Price:

BUSINESS

State prosecutors pivot to secret RICO case for ranch seizure

Monday, June 1, 2026 · from 1 podcast
  • Washington agencies used a secret RICO process to pursue criminal charges against a ranch family.
  • The state pivoted its case from wetlands to cultural resources after its initial evidence failed.
  • Moving the trial to an urban court bankrupts ranchers and strips local jury context.

Washington state agencies are using racketeering laws to pursue criminal charges in secret against the King Ranch family. Attorney Tony detailed the shift on Bitcoin & Economic News. The state’s Environmental Protection Division invoked an organized crime statute to hold sealed hearings, blocking the family from seeing evidence or even the original petition.

State prosecutors subpoenaed a young ranch employee and attempted to force testimony against his employers without a defense lawyer present. Attorneys were physically removed to the hallway while the judge and prosecutors questioned the employee privately. The state quashed the subpoena after public pressure, but did so “without prejudice,” leaving felony charges unresolved.

“They held hearings under seal, effectively keeping the King family in the dark about the evidence against them.”

- Tony, Bitcoin & Economic News

The state’s civil case began with a $267,000 fine based on a Google Earth photo alleging damage to alkali wetlands. When the family hired experts who found no wetlands, prosecutors pivoted. They now claim disturbance of “cultural resources,” a category covering potential archaeological sites. A judge granted a preliminary injunction based on this new claim, evicting the family from a 12,000-acre lease.

The lease loss has a domino effect. The ranch operates on a checkerboard of private and leased land; losing the lease blocks access to the family’s owned acreage. Tony argues agencies are seeking a legal change through courts they couldn’t achieve legislatively.

A critical tactical move involves geography. The state fights to relocate cases from local rural counties to Thurston County, home to the capital Olympia. Judges there lack context for dry-land ranching. The 150-mile distance imposes a financial and logistical burden on defendants who manage livestock daily. It isolates ranchers from a jury of peers who understand land stewardship.

“They are moving rural land disputes to urban courts to strip ranchers of local judicial context.”

- Bitcoin & Economic News

The ranch faces five simultaneous legal actions: a fine appeal, a lease default lawsuit, the secret criminal investigation, an APA suit, and a separate lease cancellation. The unresolved criminal jeopardy hampers defense in all other actions. State budgets reliant on finding violations drive the overreach.

Source Intelligence

- Deep dive into what was said in the episodes

Ranch Wars: The King Ranch | Bitcoin And RevisitedMay 31

  • Tony explains that ranching focuses on livestock production and land stewardship over generations, contrasting farming's emphasis on crop cultivation.
  • A primary reason King Ranch is targeted is government overreach, which stems from agency budgets reliant on finding violations.
  • The Washington Department of Ecology fined King Ranch $267,000 and issued a restoration order, using only a Google Earth photo to allege damage to alkali wetlands.
  • King Ranch has faced five simultaneous legal actions from the state: a fine appeal, a lease default lawsuit with DNR, a secret criminal investigation, an APA suit against DOE, and a separate DNR lease cancellation in Douglas County.
  • The criminal case was initiated under an organized crime statute, keeping proceedings secret and blocking the ranch from seeing evidence or the original petition.
  • Hired experts found no alkali wetland characteristics at the site, noting the alleged wetlands are man-made stock ponds vital for cattle and wildlife in an arid region averaging eight inches of annual rain.
  • The criminal hearing saw the judge close the courtroom, deny the defense a motion filed the night before, and after quashing a subpoena, ask the defense attorney why they couldn't just take the win.
  • State prosecutors later pivoted from wetland allegations to cultural resource disturbance claims for a preliminary injunction, which was granted despite the alleged sites covering only 0.0038% of the 12,000-acre lease.
  • Tony argues ranchers are easy targets because they are independent, avoid seeking help, and don't communicate problems, which isolates them during legal battles.
  • The criminal jeopardy remains unresolved, with the state refusing to confirm it won't pursue charges, hampering the ranch's ability to defend itself in other legal actions.
Also from this episode: (3)

Climate (1)

  • Tony states that holistic ranching, including practices like the 'third, third, third' grazing rule, improves soil health, sequesters carbon, and supports wildlife, countering environmental harm claims.

Health (1)

  • David Bennett suspects attacks on ranching and red meat nutrition may be financially motivated, citing pharmaceutical advertising dominance in media that criticizes cattle.

Culture (1)

  • The ranch has support from agricultural groups like the Washington Farm Bureau, the Dairy Federation, and Western Justice, which is producing a documentary on government overreach.