Anthropic isn’t just racing for the enterprise AI market - it’s accused of trying to lock the door behind itself.
On *All-In*, David Sacks argues Anthropic’s technical excellence in coding tools is matched by a darker strategy. The company lobbies Washington for a permissioning regime where labs must seek government approval before releasing models or selling chips. Sacks claims this would create insurmountable moats for smaller competitors, allowing incumbents like Anthropic to control the market.
David Sacks, All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg:
- Anthropic is sort of the most AGI-pilled of all the frontier labs.
- They made this bet on coding as their way to get to recursive self-improvement.
Anthropic’s dominance comes as its most powerful model, Claude Mythos, was leaked via an unsecured database. The company confirmed the “step change” model is designed for heavy-duty coding and reasoning tasks. *The AI Daily Brief* reported it's currently limited to security researchers to vet its advanced cyber capabilities.
The leak coincides with rumors of an October IPO, intensifying competition with OpenAI. Chamath Palihapitiya clarifies they aren’t direct rivals: OpenAI dominates consumer subscriptions, while Anthropic owns the developer API market.
Chamath Palihapitiya, All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg:
- OpenAI is three-quarters consumer subscriptions and a quarter API.
- Anthropic is almost the exact opposite.
While Anthropic maneuvers for regulatory advantage, OpenAI shelved its “adult mode” due to safety failures and is refocusing on enterprise sales. Both labs are converging on the same prize - profitable enterprise tools - but Anthropic appears to be playing a longer game, using both code and politics to build its fortress.

