Square’s automatic Bitcoin payment setting flips the script on merchant custody. David Bennett explained on Bitcoin And that millions of merchants now default to accepting Bitcoin without ever touching the asset or a private key. The system settles in dollars, meaning Square, not the merchant, officially accepts the crypto - a crucial distinction for IRS reporting. This positions Bitcoin purely as a payment rail, abstracting away its financial sovereignty.
The convenience comes with a custody trade-off. Joe Kelly of Unchained argues that while technical control resides with the key holder, legal ownership in probate or tax court often requires formal documentation only institutions provide. Multi-signature setups, where moving funds requires multiple keys, offer a middle ground by protecting against a single lost key while allowing for recovery assistance.
Meanwhile, a new quantum computing paper from Google and the Ethereum Foundation claims Bitcoin’s cryptography is vulnerable. Developers dismiss it as incentivized FUD, noting conflict of interest from co-author Justin Drake of the Ethereum Foundation, which is designing its own post-quantum roadmap. Bitcoin contributor Giacomo Zucco states the required logical qubit has “no credible engineering roadmap to exist.”
This tension between seamless abstraction and personal sovereignty defines the current phase. For merchants, Square’s model eliminates complexity. For holders, the choice is between the legal protections of institutional custody and the cryptographic finality of self-custody - a spectrum where control and convenience pull in opposite directions.
David Bennett, Bitcoin And:
- I can walk up to a square merchant today and unless that square merchant has purposely gone through the settings and turned off all Bitcoin functionality, then I will have the option to pay that invoice in Bitcoin or lightning.
- Square accepted the Bitcoin, not the merchant, which is an important distinction for the Internal Revenue Service.
Giacomo Zucco, Bitcoin And:
- A single logical qubit with a sufficiently low error rate to pose a practical problem has no credible engineering roadmap to exist.
- Quantum FUD is at best useless and at worst, actively harmful.

