The political lane for nationalizing AI profits is suddenly wide open. President Donald Trump confirmed his administration is “exploring concepts” where the American public becomes a partner in leading AI labs, a move The AI Daily Brief’s Nathaniel Whittemore notes creates rare common ground with Senator Bernie Sanders.
On Breaking Points, economics correspondent Jeff Stein reported that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman likely proposed the plan, offering the government an equity stake to secure “too big to fail” status before the bubble bursts. The goal is to buy populist favor by promising public dividends from AI profits, a direct answer to critics of soaring energy costs and unchecked power.
The equity gambit arrives alongside the administration’s first substantive regulatory gesture. After a year of hands-off policy guided by AI czar David Sacks, Trump signed an executive order requiring companies to voluntarily share advanced models with the government 30 days before release. The Daily reported the policy shift was triggered by Anthropic’s April announcement of Mythos, an AI model deemed too dangerous for public release due to its skill at finding software vulnerabilities.
"Sam Altman is pitching a radical survival strategy to the Trump administration: let the government become a major shareholder in OpenAI."
- Jeff Stein, Breaking Points
The final order was a dramatic retreat from a tougher draft, following last-minute intervention from Silicon Valley. An initial version mandated a 90-day review period, but The Daily notes Trump canceled the signing ceremony after calls from executives like Mark Zuckerberg and Marc Andreessen. The signed version shrinks the window to 30 days and explicitly forbids the creation of a mandatory licensing regime.
Whittemore calls the result a “Rorschach test policy” that gives everyone something to claim. For safety advocates like former advisor Dean Ball, cited in The AI Daily Brief, the infrastructure tees up future mandatory licensing. For tech interests, the voluntary nature and disclaimer against overreach protect the status quo. The NSA will test models but has no power to block their release.
Outside the West Wing, a populist coalition is demanding far more. Steve Bannon is channeling base anxiety over AI’s economic impact, while Sanders has proposed the government seize a 50% ownership stake in major AI firms. The industry’s response is a double game: OpenAI publicly encourages “rigorous rules” while its founders fund candidates who favor a hands-off approach.
"The policy process for the latest AI executive order was a mess of last-minute calls and scrapped ceremonies."
- Nathaniel Whittemore, The AI Daily Brief
The drive for public stakes reflects a deeper political calculation. With chip stocks erasing $1.2 trillion in value in a single day, the AI trade is showing fragility. Offering the state a piece of the pie may be the industry’s best hedge against a backlash when the bubble deflates.


