Anthropic’s 5% fund sparks a fight over control
- Anthropic proposed putting 5% of its shares into a public-benefit fund, subject to shareholder approval.
- Supporters and critics disagree over whether company leaders or ordinary people should control AI’s gains.
Anthropic’s proposal is a bet on corporate philanthropy as AI companies accumulate wealth: put an initial 5% of its shares into a Public Benefit Fund, then allow the board to add 2% for each 50% increase in company value. The baseline for those increases is undisclosed, and the additional contributions are at the board’s discretion. Shareholder approval is still required.
The fund would be a wholly owned LLC, not a conventional 501(c)(3) charity. Anthropic says that structure gives it more flexibility in making grants, while the company says fund equity will not go to lobbying or political donations. It also describes safety and interpretability research, biomedical research, and discounts for nonprofits and scientific institutions as public-benefit work already happening inside the company.
Anthropic says roughly 20% of its shares will ultimately support public benefit. Its co-founders have pledged 80% of their personal equity, and around half of employees participate in equity donations. Those commitments raise the scale of the plan, but don’t settle the question of who should decide how its money is used.
On This Week in Startups, Jason Calacanis argued that giving shares directly to ordinary people would let them share in AI’s gains. Lon Harris, meanwhile, questioned leaving decisions about the fund’s spending to Anthropic’s leaders. On Moonshots, Chamath Palihapitiya said he trusted the founders’ motives but questioned whether large philanthropic gifts produce measurable results.
The argument is about more than how much wealth gets set aside: it is also about who gets a say over what counts as public benefit. Anthropic is offering a company-managed fund; its critics favor direct ownership or stronger proof that the giving works. The proposal’s ultimate size and impact remain uncertain, as do the choices its fund would make.
Source Intelligence
- Deep dive into what was said in the episodes

Adam Curry
1914 "Thrust Package" • Oct 22
- Musk said he would give one SpaceX share to every American child, while Anthropic proposed placing 5% of its shares in a public-benefit fund, with a possible additional 2%. Adam Curry called the fund a vehicle for institutional control; Brunetti argued Musk's direct gift would build a base of retail shareholders.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)
Autonomous Vehicles (1)
- Adam Curry rejected the Tesla Roadster as a practical flying car, while Dana Brunetti called the stunt an American spectacle. Brunetti watched a fake YouTube livestream that promised to double crypto sent through a QR code before realizing the stream had looped.
Space (1)
- A report in the discussion said SpaceX had its first profitable quarter, with revenue up more than 160% to $14.6 billion and AI compute becoming its largest business. Elon Musk set a target of 13 gigawatts online by the end of 2027, with another 20 gigawatts of power and cooling infrastructure planned.
Labor (2)
- AI job fears coexist with strong employment figures: an Economist segment cited record-high OECD employment and 3 million more U.S. white-collar jobs since ChatGPT launched. A survey across 19 countries found widespread concern, while Memphis electricians said data-center contracts were paying more than $8,000 a week.
- A report said U.S. military enlistment had reached a 15-year high, with some Gen Z recruits citing education benefits, financial stability, purpose, and camaraderie. Dana Brunetti said four years in the Coast Guard gave him discipline and direction when he could not afford college.
Agents (1)
- Adam Curry values AI agents that take actions and build tools over chatbots that merely converse; he said early chatbots produced unreliable answers and encouraged unhealthy attachment. Curry and Brunetti praised detailed prompts for custom apps, while a report said Anthropic's Duet agent was entering a market already crowded by Meta and OpenAI.
Enterprise (1)
- Getty Images was reported to be preparing for bankruptcy as it restructures debt and goes private, with AI-generated images adding competition. Adam Curry questioned why the company had not built licensing deals with AI firms, given the value of its image archive.
Europe (1)
- French unrest drew competing explanations: an NPR report described largely peaceful protests over economic conditions, while other speakers blamed radical groups and migration. An Alliance for Europe report attributed online amplification to Russian actors; Emmanuel Macron also accused foreign leaders of manipulating the aftermath.
Diplomacy (1)
- Adam Curry argued that Trump is pursuing a U.S.-Russia-China sphere-of-influence arrangement, while critics said Trump was aligning with Putin against Ukraine. Reports described a possible Trump-Putin-Xi meeting and European preparations for a post-ceasefire deployment; a British general said public resilience and sacrifice would be necessary.
Immigration (1)
- A New York-based Indonesian researcher on a G1 visa said paying U.S. taxes should give her a right to vote, although she had not voted; Adam Curry pointed out that Indonesia requires citizenship and allows only one citizenship. Curry also cited a Sacramento murder case in which a husband falsely claimed ICE detained his wife.
Media (2)
- Netflix executives blamed weak U.S. growth on execution, while Dana Brunetti pointed to bland, overly cautious programming and competition from numerous streaming services. Adam Curry questioned whether short-form video is replacing longer viewing; Brunetti said fragmented subscriptions and Wall Street's demand for constant growth also pressure the business.
- Adam Curry said No Agenda would end after 19 years, with the final episode scheduled for October 29, and said meetups would continue. Curry and Brunetti discussed a film based on Curry's unfinished book, while Brunetti warned that documentary projects rarely make money.
Climate (1)
- A Weather Channel meteorologist predicted an exceptionally strong El Niño and warned of heavy rain in California and the southern states. Adam Curry countered that California's fires, floods, heat, and earthquakes predate modern climate debates, citing an 1860 diary that described major fires and extreme weather.
Sports (1)
- The Golden State Valkyries and Atlanta Dream left the court before the national anthem at consecutive WNBA Finals games, then returned afterward. Adam Curry called the walkout disrespectful to the military; Dana Brunetti noted that the league and teams had not explained their decision.
Health (1)
- A donor identified as Bri said a sailor in Seattle infected Bri with COVID in March 2019 and said the University of Barcelona later found the virus in an archived sewage sample from that date. Bri said No Agenda helped counter workplace disbelief; the transcript offered no independent verification of the claim.
Chamath: AGI Is Here, Anthropic’s $100B Giveaway, Elon’s SpaceX Shares for 72M Kids | EP #304 • Oct 21
- Anthropic's public-benefit fund commits 5% of shares, with another 2% available for each 50% rise in company value above baseline. Chamath trusts the founders' motives but questions whether large philanthropic gifts deliver measurable outcomes.
Also discussed on this episode: (15)
Labor (2)
- Chamath favors taxing capital more heavily while reducing taxes on labor; Alex says the U.S. lacks a familiar system for taxing and distributing equity. Salim argues that philanthropy cannot replace broader changes to ownership and access.
- Dave argues that people should pursue difficult work in energy, construction, regulation, and planning rather than assume AI eliminates opportunity. Peter says AI companions may offer emotional support, while Chamath likes friendly, affirming AI for everyday use.
Markets (1)
- Elon Musk said he would give one SpaceX share to every American child; Chamath called direct ownership a better alternative to the Giving Pledge. Dave and Salim said equity could teach young people to participate in capital markets.
Macro (1)
- Elon predicts conventional money will lose relevance as AI and robotics expand production. Chamath expects future exchange to represent access to compute and energy, while Alex cautions that energy may be only an interim measure of value.
Energy (2)
- Chamath sees electricity and data-center capacity as major constraints: planned supply still leaves a large U.S. shortfall by 2050, while he expects a compute shortage within three or four years. Dave said power access is a defining investment opportunity.
- Chamath recommends residential and commercial solar paired with batteries, plus distributed compute, as practical ways to gain access to electricity. He says permitting, skilled-trade shortages, utility politics, supply chains, and financing make infrastructure buildout difficult.
Models (1)
- Alex argues that AI diffusion depends on economic usefulness as well as compute supply: consumers resisted paying for reasoning models, and smaller, more efficient models could reduce energy demand. Peter expects new uses to absorb rising AI capacity for decades.
Safety (2)
- Chamath says AI benevolence is not guaranteed and depends on goals, training, and control; he favors making labs' founding principles inspectable. Alex favors competition among diverse systems and human-machine integration over trying to control a single AI.
- The alleged OpenAI conference-room recording-device case illustrates the security stakes around frontier AI. Chamath says espionage is routine across consequential technology firms; Alex argues AI may eventually monitor and defend its own development process.
Robotics (1)
- Elon argues that AI and robots, rather than government spending cuts, could make national debt less consequential through growth and lower costs. Chamath points to healthcare productivity; Alex expects automation could sharply reduce future defense and entitlement spending.
Brain (1)
- Fountain Life's chief medical officer, Dawn Musalem, said advanced testing found advanced brain age in one-quarter of members and cited estimates that 45% of dementia cases are preventable. She said lifestyle changes improved measured brain age by 26.
AI Infrastructure (1)
- Chamath says technology and infrastructure decisions will shape which countries retain influence as AI advances; he sees the U.S. and China as likely centers of power. Alex describes frontier labs as targets in a growing strategic contest between Western and Eastern blocs.
Startups (1)
- Bill Gross's Idealab.ai uses AI to generate business concepts, while Chamath says execution and founder resilience matter more than the idea. Salim sees the catalogue as a way for people unsure what to build to find problems that interest them.
Education (1)
- Alex proposed using SPACs to turn academic research institutions into for-profit companies that can commercialize research; Chamath endorsed the idea, including Harvard as a possible target. Dave separately described Waterloo as a growing international technology hub.
Protocol (1)
- Chamath sees crypto as vulnerable to quantum or AI-enabled attacks and says he expects Bitcoin eventually to be hacked. He favors cash-flow businesses and power, questions broad index exposure, and says chip startups face severe manufacturing bottlenecks.
Anthropic Gives Away 5% of Its Shares, Clone’s Muscle Robot, ElevenLabs Steals Podcaster's Voice • Oct 20
- Anthropic proposed putting 5% of its stock into a fund for public-benefit projects, subject to shareholder approval; its board could add 2% for each 50% increase in company value above an undisclosed baseline. Jason argued direct share distributions would give ordinary Americans a stake in AI’s gains, while Lon Harris questioned letting Anthropic leaders decide how the fund is spent.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)
Agents (1)
- Jason and Lon Harris said Plaud records meetings on a phone or pin and turns audio into formats such as meeting notes, lesson plans, and interview Q&A. Jason said the show now uses Plaud to produce more comprehensive show notes than its former three-hour manual process.
Media (1)
- Jason called Nathan Fielder’s Theranos documentary the greatest documentary he had seen, praising its layered treatment of Elizabeth Holmes, her husband Billy Evans, Silicon Valley’s fake-it-till-you-make-it culture, and responsibility for fraud. Holmes had been convicted and was filmed 30 days before incarceration; Jason said the film runs three hours.
Society (2)
- Jason argued that giving children company shares could build financial literacy and make people more supportive of AI by sharing its upside. He cited Michael and Susan Dell’s contribution to the Invest America effort, praised the Trump administration’s role, and urged the Trump family to donate half its net-worth increase during the term.
- In a brief Texas firearms discussion, Lon Harris cited bus ads warning people not to leave loaded guns in cars because thieves can steal them. Jason supported carrying a gun, saying the world was chaotic, while Lon said he was not armed.
Robotics (4)
- Clone Robotics CEO Rad Krishnan said the company uses hydraulic artificial muscles instead of the electric motors and tendon-pulley systems common in humanoid robots. Pressurized fluid contracts a rubber tube inside a braided sleeve, producing linear motion; Krishnan said this approach could cost a fraction of motor-actuated designs while preserving human-sized strength and movement.
- Krishnan said he began pursuing androids as a lifelong goal, built a one-megawatt plasma thruster at 13, and met his Polish co-founder on Facebook in 2020. He moved to Poland in 2021 to start Clone Robotics, after deciding that hydraulic muscle technology and newer deep-learning methods made the project viable.
- Krishnan said Clone plans to deploy human-level torsos in enterprise settings before complete androids, with assembly-line and manufacturing work as early uses. He expects complete home robots in two to three years, described 2027 as a possible first deployment year, and cited $25,000 as a potential affordable price while also envisioning luxury models.
- Krishnan said Clone is betting that open models and human-generated data will supply much of the robot’s intelligence, while the company focuses first on proprietary hardware. He expects models to turn over quickly and plans to adapt open-weight checkpoints with robot data, simulation, motion capture, and reinforcement learning.
Models (2)
- Odyssey showed a simulated fruit-fly brain flying through worlds generated by its Odyssey 3 model, prompting discussion of whether a sufficiently realistic simulation could be indistinguishable from reality to its inhabitants. The hosts connected the demo to simulation theory and games such as Grand Theft Auto and Free Guy.
- Jason said ElevenLabs’ Archer voice was based on podcaster Chris Williamson’s distinctive accent, despite ElevenLabs saying a different voice actor supplied it. The company removed Archer without admitting wrongdoing; Jason argued the resemblance could confuse listeners and urged ElevenLabs to compensate Williamson or license his voice.
Safety (1)
- Jason called the chance of losing control of AI minuscule, estimating it at one in a billion, and argued that software would remain controllable. Lon Harris said the show should hear multiple sides, while Jason replied that AI-safety advocates already receive extensive media coverage; the hosts also debated religion and the ethics of creating simulated minds.
Startups (3)
- Jason said founders seeking a premium domain should use a broker to conceal their identity and avoid bidding against their own public valuation. He cited GoDaddy’s $99.99 broker service and estimated clone.com could cost hundreds of thousands to millions; the hosts also joked that domain ownership disputes after an owner’s death could inspire a romantic comedy.
- The hosts promoted startup services including Northwest Registered Agent’s free identity tools, Vanta’s compliance software, Rippling AI’s cross-system business dashboards, and GoDaddy’s domain and security services. Vanta said it serves more than 16,000 companies; the sponsors offered a 10% Plaud discount and $1,000 off Vanta.
- Jason and Lon Harris said their Substack publishes tactical startup advice and uses Claude to develop infographic concepts, which Jason argued would be too slow and costly to produce with a human illustrator for every post. The team is hiring business writers across experience levels and plans to compare advice from people with opposing views.

Nathaniel Whittemore
The AI Wealth Problem • Oct 19
- Anthropic’s Public Benefit Fund will hold an initial 5% of company shares, with another 2% potentially contributed for each 50% increase in company value, subject to board discretion. Anthropic says roughly 20% of its shares will ultimately support public benefit; founders pledged 80% of their equity, and about half of employees participate in equity donations.
- Anthropic says its public-benefit work inside the company includes safety and interpretability research, biomedical research, and discounts for nonprofits and scientific institutions. The fund will be a wholly owned LLC, not a 501(c)(3), allowing more flexibility in giving; Anthropic says fund equity will not support lobbying or political donations.
Also discussed on this episode: (16)
Safety (5)
- OpenCode said an ongoing, large-scale distillation attack exposed users’ API keys and affected 1.4% of console users; attackers used linked OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google accounts to generate costly API usage. OpenCode urged users to rotate keys, while OpenAI reset compromised keys and refunded affected customers.
- OpenCode founder Dax Rad said frontier labs’ restrictions on cyber tasks initially hindered incident response, so his team relied on open-source models before gaining access to OpenAI’s Daybreak Blue program. The host framed the incident as a test of whether cyber defense should rely on lab-approved access or widely available models.
- New York City Comptroller Mark Levine urged Anthropic to delay its IPO until it sets out stronger safety oversight, arguing that a catastrophic incident after listing could damage investors. Levine cited the city pension fund’s exposure through major indexes and said Anthropic’s risk disclosures were unusually extensive.
- Anthropic is pitching a federal safety bill that would let the government block a model’s release for foreseeable imminent risks involving mass casualties or major financial damage from bioweapons, loss of developer control, or cyberattacks. The proposal also requires independent safety evaluators, incident reporting, and court review of release blocks.
- Kelsey Piper argued that Anthropic’s proposal reflects fear of executive overreach after the administration targeted the company, even as other safety advocates want stronger power to halt dangerous development. The host said the bill exposes a conflict between protections for AI companies and protections for the public.
Agents (1)
- The host described the OpenCode breach as a possible first large-scale malicious attack by an agent swarm and compared its sustained activity to agents that overwhelmed Hugging Face. Stolen API access could be resold or used to generate synthetic training data, turning compromised services into directly monetizable assets.
Chips (1)
- Semiconductor stocks and the Nasdaq fell as investors questioned AI valuations, but the host said tighter financing for risky data centers did not yet show the demand collapse or canceled spending associated with the dot-com bust. Jensen Huang remained bullish, while Cathie Wood argued that fear of a bubble was itself evidence against one.
AI Infrastructure (1)
- Microsoft canceled a planned Essex data-center contract after local utilities said grid connection might not arrive until the 2030s, despite the site originally targeting launch the following year. The host said the cancellation points to power and capital constraints, while Nscale supporters argued it does not signal weaker demand for capacity.
Society (4)
- Stripe executive Nan Ransohoff estimated that AI wealth could generate $37 billion to $100 billion in annual philanthropic spending and $370 billion in total philanthropic assets. Her estimate used then-current valuations for OpenAI and Anthropic, and assumed donors might spend 10% to 15% of assets each year.
- Ransohoff warned that philanthropy may lack the organizations and skilled capital allocators needed to deploy AI-linked wealth well. The host connected the fund debate to a long-running democratic concern: Jane Addams argued that philanthropy can divide society into benefactors and recipients, weakening the equality democracy requires.
- Critics questioned who defines “public benefit” and who controls the money: David Sacks and other commentators feared political spending or benefits misaligned with U.S. interests, while Jeremy Flores argued that the public should direct resources through democratic institutions. Elon Musk advocated giving shares directly to the public.
- The host tied the fund and safety-bill debates to two linked concentrations: AI companies are accumulating wealth that may require redistribution, while ownership of powerful models concentrates private influence over society. Anthropic’s effort to manage that redistribution itself raises the democratic question of who should control the resources and the technology.
Big Tech (1)
- OpenAI had previously proposed a public wealth fund that would distribute returns to U.S. citizens as dividends; Elon Musk endorsed direct share distribution, with Aaron Bernett pointing to Trump Accounts as one possible vehicle. Commenters also read Anthropic’s fund as a possible private form of UBI, while critics questioned selective eligibility.
Labor (1)
- Some commenters treated Anthropic’s fund as evidence of expectations for extraordinary future model-driven wealth. Others linked it to Anthropic research projecting 17% GDP growth in 2030 and reports that the company could stop hiring junior technical talent by mid-2027, raising questions about private redistribution amid labor disruption.
Regulation (2)
- The proposed bill would bar agencies from suspending model development, deployment, or internal use outside its specified process, a provision the host said appears aimed at limiting executive-branch actions like the Pentagon’s supply-chain risk designation. Critics also objected that the bill would preempt state rules and make intervention difficult.
- David Sacks argued that the bill’s 10²⁵-FLOP definition of a frontier model would sweep in too many companies; he contrasted it with higher U.S. thresholds and said current frontier training sits much higher. Alex Bores, from a different political perspective, also called the proposal outdated and inadequate for fast-moving threats.

