Your signal. Your price.

Danny Knowles highlights Michael Saylor's unique decision to fold MicroStrategy's traditional treasury strategy and buy Bitcoin. Jordi Visser argues this trade reflects the realization that small and mid-sized firms cannot outcompete monopolistic tech giants.
Jordi Visser claims the wealthiest global investors hold nine hundred trillion dollars in assets and currently ignore Bitcoin because they do not need it. This institutional indifference will end as artificial intelligence degrades traditional fiat investments.
Jordi Visser argues the current artificial intelligence trade is not a bubble because demand for raw compute outstrips supply through at least 2028. True market bubbles only occur when capital supply exceeds organic consumer and enterprise demand.
Jordi Visser explains that tech stock multiples are compressing because artificial intelligence makes corporate terminal value highly uncertain five years out. This structural shift explains why companies like Nvidia and Micron trade at low price-to-earnings ratios.
Jordi Visser asserts central bank interest rates no longer dictate macroeconomic health because US household net worth sits at record highs. Forty percent of US homes are fully paid off, shielding most consumers from rising borrowing costs.
Jordi Visser highlights state inefficiency by pointing out that while US legislators delayed the Clarity Act, Anthropic scaled its revenues massively. Technological velocity bypasses slow state institutions, rendering traditional regulatory roadblocks ineffective against fast-moving sectors.
Jordi Visser claims autonomous AI agents will reject legacy payment networks like Visa and MasterCard due to settlement latency and fees. Agents will instead transact on high-speed, programmable crypto rails to execute automated micro-transactions.
Jordi Visser predicts governments will tax corporate AI agents and humanoid robots to fund universal basic income programs. This taxation will become politically necessary as AI halts entry-level corporate hiring and limits economic mobility for human workers.
Jordi Visser suggests healthcare entitlements will face structural changes by 2032 as artificial intelligence drives exponential longevity breakthroughs. If older populations die of old age rather than prolonged chronic diseases, late-life medical burdens will drop sharply.
Jordi Visser forecasts the total crypto market cap will reach one hundred trillion dollars by 2035, with Bitcoin capturing a third of that value. This expansion depends on AI-driven deflation pushing sovereign capital into non-dilutable digital assets.
Jordi Visser predicts public equity markets will lose their monopoly on growth as tokenization allows builders to raise capital directly from online communities. This shift enables future founders to retain up to ninety percent of their equity.
Andy Constan began his financial career at Solomon Brothers in 1986, working on the Brady Commission investigating the 1987 stock market crash. He later spent years at Bridgewater Associates and Brevin Howard before launching Damp Spring in 2019.
Andy Constan identifies four institutional approaches to assets: intermediation like BlackRock's ETF, corporate treasury cash management, directional market timing, and non-directional arbitrage. BlackRock operates purely as an intermediary, carrying no directional view on Bitcoin's price.
Andy Constan argues that neither Bitcoin nor gold pays a risk premium because there is no issuer competing for cash to fund productive business projects. Both assets function primarily as spot currencies rather than yielding investments.
Andy Constan argues the bond bubble burst in summer 2020 when the 10-year yield hit 65 basis points. While bonds performed poorly afterward, yields near 5.2% now make them a viable hedge against future economic deceleration.
Andy Constan allocates 10% of his portfolio to gold as a debasement hedge but refuses to swap it for Bitcoin. He avoids Bitcoin because of its high volatility, its Nasdaq correlation, and its near-zero correlation to gold over the past three years.
Andy Constan briefly traded Bitcoin, purchasing it at the meme-inspired price of $69,420 and selling it at $84,000. He currently holds no Bitcoin but maintains a pending buy order at $420.69.
Andy Constan notes that Bitcoin's bear market drawdowns have decreased from 80% to 50%, signaling structural maturation. However, he prefers leveraging gold at 20% volatility to match Bitcoin's 60% volatility because gold offers higher expected return confidence.
Andy Constan blames both US political parties for expanding the national debt since Richard Nixon abandoned Bretton Woods. The current US deficit stands at approximately 6% of GDP, with neither party willing to cut spending or raise taxes.
Danny Knowles and Andy Constan note that the last US budget surpluses occurred in 1997 and 1998 under the Bill Clinton administration. These surpluses resulted from strict spending limits and the productivity gains of the early internet boom.
Andy Constan proposes solving the deficit by raising all tax revenues by 3% and cutting all non-interest spending by 3%. While this combined policy would successfully lower interest rates, it would also trigger a severe economic recession.
Andy Constan argues that governments possess extensive legal levers to inflate away debt at the expense of savers. This monetary debasement functions as a political choice to transfer wealth between different cohorts of society to avoid fiscal austerity.
Peter St Onge argues that governments easily corrupt academic economics because the discipline is vital for central planning. The Federal Reserve uses its unlimited budget to bribe monetary economists with research grants, influencing junior academics for minor sums.
Peter St Onge characterizes the two percent inflation target as a systematic wealth siphon that deprives citizens of natural deflation driven by productivity. This mechanism transfers roughly one trillion dollars annually from the public to the government and financial institutions.
Peter St Onge disputes the mainstream economic claim that deflation halts consumption, citing the nineteenth-century Long Depression as a period of falling prices and massive technological innovation. He argues that only central bank credit contractions cause harmful deflation.
Peter St Onge points to a Bank of England historical study showing that global real interest rates averaged roughly two and a half to three percent over nine centuries. This suggests current US nominal rates are economically neutral once adjusted for inflation.
Peter St Onge warns that a future recession could double the US deficit to four trillion dollars, or thirteen percent of GDP, as tax revenues dry up. This dynamic risks entering a debt doom loop as government interest expenses balloon.
Peter St Onge contrasts the quick recovery of the 1920 depression, where the US government allowed market liquidation, with the prolonged pain of 1929 caused by state interventions. He argues that massive global COVID bailouts suppressed natural bankruptcies, leaving hidden dead wood.
Peter St Onge estimates the current AI investment cycle is five times larger than the dot-com boom, representing the most dominant technology wave since nineteenth-century railroads. He projects the current bubble will peak and pop around late 2027 or early 2028.
Peter St Onge argues that foundational AI models operate as low-margin commodity products without pricing power, prompting developers to lobby for state regulations to choke off competitors. Real value is instead accruing to hardware and chip manufacturers.