Your signal. Your price.

Matt Dines argues the US financial system is transitioning from an era of Federal Reserve dominance and Treasury subservience to an era of US Treasury dominance and Fed subordination.
Dines defines the offshore dollar era as a 75-80 year system where London-based LIBOR set the cost of dollar credit, requiring the Fed to bail out the global bubble repeatedly.
In 2022, the US asserted dominance by moving the marginal dollar pricing from LIBOR to SOFR, a New York-based, Treasury-collateralized rate, marking the end of the offshore era.
Dines says stablecoins like Tether ($186B) represent an emergent, asset-backed dollar anchored to Treasury bills, steering power from London to Washington.
The Genius Act, passed in 2025, legislated stablecoin regulation and represents a fork away from a CBDC path, creating a private stablecoin dollar backed by Treasury debt.
He sees the 2024 election as a vote on the dollar's future: Biden's path was a CBDC, while Trump's path is stablecoins and a potential Bitcoin reserve.
Dines argues perpetual preferreds issued by Bitcoin treasury companies are frontier credits rated B-minus by S&P, with upside capped and significant downside risk.
He views the strategy as a dollar strategy, sourcing onshore dollar liquidity at 11-13% to go long Bitcoin in the offshore dollar liquidity pool.
Dines says Bitcoin treasury companies rely on financing cash flows to pay distributions; if capital markets pull back, they face a liquidity fight.
He points to Venezuela and Iran re-entering dollar payment rails via stablecoins as evidence of the new system offering lower transaction costs.
Dines argues a future Bitcoin reserve could emerge once stablecoin supply dwarfs the offshore system, providing a new asset peg for the dollar.
He compares the current transition to the Civil War greenback era, where a temporary paper script was later remonetized back onto a gold standard.
Dines says Treasury debt maturity is shrinking towards bills, with weekly $80B auctions, reflecting the system's shift and lack of long-term capacity.
He cites Kevin Warsh's Fed nomination and his rejection of forward guidance as a signal of moving away from Fed dominance and Keynesian orthodoxy.
Adam Livingston argues that the market currently casts Michael Saylor as a villain, despite his role as a hero during bull markets, reflecting a philosophical split within the Bitcoin community.
Adam Livingston believes MicroStrategy (STRC) made a misstep by using cash reserves to pay off $1.38 billion in convertible debt, which was not due until September 2027.
Danny Knowles notes STRC is trading below its $100 par value, at just under $89, and has not reached par since mid-May.
Adam Livingston states STRC's effective yield is over 13%, indicating the market demands higher compensation for holding the equity/credit hybrid, which is not a stablecoin peg despite its 'par stability mechanic'.
Adam Livingston predicts STRC will return to par due to MicroStrategy's strong credit quality, open capital markets access, and sufficient Bitcoin holdings to cover dividends for decades, raising $300 million last week.
Adam Livingston notes that while Strive (SEDA) has 43 times less Bitcoin coverage than MicroStrategy, it holds 11 months more cash, influencing how the market prices these competing digital credit instruments.
Adam Livingston asserts that MSTR has historically outperformed Bitcoin in fiat terms, winning 86% of all possible holding periods since the STRC IPO on July 28th.
Adam Livingston clarifies that STRC has a +6% total return since its IPO, including dividends, even as Bitcoin's price has fallen 50% over the same period, though those who bought at $100 par are underwater.
Adam Livingston indicates MicroStrategy's common equity impairment level is around a $25,000 Bitcoin price, where its Bitcoin net asset value equals senior capital, but MSTR stock does not go to zero.
Adam Livingston points out that Bitcoin's volatility has nearly halved since 2022, making extreme price moves statistically less likely despite current market sentiment being comparable to FTX crash levels.
Adam Livingston reports that the S&P 500's composite price-to-earnings multiple is 29, suggesting equities are overvalued amid high market uncertainty, which he contrasts with Bitcoin's long-term value proposition.
Adam Livingston believes the Fed is in a 'triple squeeze' regarding monetary policy, and Warsh's discussions about recalculating inflation and reducing forward guidance are manipulative tactics to justify rate cuts.
Adam Livingston cites a 25-study meta-analysis concluding that Bitcoin is the most reactionary asset to both actual Federal Reserve rate changes and the market's perception of those changes.
Adam Livingston states that the United States national debt is on pace to exceed $50 trillion by the end of President Trump's next potential term.