Your signal. Your price.

Jake Woodhouse argues that Bitcoin owners must test whether they can recover their Bitcoin without their custody provider.
Woodhouse states self-custody is not a destination but a process requiring periodic reviews and updates to plans.
Woodhouse cites a Twitter poll where Bitcoin owners overwhelmingly said losing access to their Bitcoin is a greater fear than a 50% price drawdown.
Woodhouse explains Bitcoin custody exists on a spectrum from convenient exchange-held IOUs to highly secure, geographically dispersed multi-signature setups.
Woodhouse warns that a provider dependency exists if you cannot rebuild your wallet using Bitcoin's open-source tools if that provider disappears.
Woodhouse highlights that inheritance planning for Bitcoin is crucial because lawyers often lack expertise, and a legal will alone may not secure the assets.
Woodhouse advises never blindly accepting software updates for wallet apps and to verify changes because they could alter critical recovery parameters.
Woodhouse notes that AUSTRAC regulations in Australia now require exchanges to collect sender and recipient details for all transfers, starting July 1.
Woodhouse describes coinjoin tools as a method to obscure Bitcoin transaction trails, analogous to a getaway cowboy erasing tracks.
Woodhouse defines his role as a Bitcoin custody architect, designing holistic custody systems above specific providers to eliminate dependencies.