Governments can cut the cord. Iran proved it by severing global internet access for 20 days. On Rabbit Hole Recap, the hosts framed this as a brutal stress test for digital sovereignty. When a state controls the pipes, it can turn them off. The same logic applies to financial rails.
The parallel is physical control, like TSA lines - a system that persists because elites are exempt. These tiered systems of inconvenience and censorship fuel the practical case for tools like Bitcoin, which operate outside centralized control.
While the infrastructure for permissionless payments is building, adoption remains a grind. Square is enabling Bitcoin Lightning payments for millions of its merchants, but the rollout is passive. As Steve from the Presidio Bitcoin Jam noted, merchants won't automatically appear on Bitcoin maps like BTC Map or even know they accept it. The user experience is still clunky, requiring separate QR codes and likely settling in dollars.
Real-world use will still depend on advocates evangelizing at the point of sale. This technical step forward doesn't solve the merchant awareness problem.
This friction highlights a deeper challenge: scaling without purpose just creates noise. On The Bitcoin Podcast, Dr. Corey Petty argued that chasing mass adoption is the wrong goal. The right goal is 'wholesome adoption,' built on a coherent community with shared purpose. Without that coherence, growth amplifies noise instead of signal.
The tools for digital sovereignty are being built, but their adoption hinges on overcoming human hurdles - from merchant education to community cohesion - not just technical ones.
Dr. Corey Petty, The Bitcoin Podcast:
- But the whole idea was coherence, right?
- If you just grow the number, you end up just growing noise, and it removes your ability to have a signal that has impact.



