The taxman is coming armed with a trap.
The IRS has deployed a new, aggressive audit questionnaire for crypto holders, demanding a full transaction history dating back to their first-ever purchase. Tax attorney Andrew Gordon explained on TFTC: A Bitcoin Podcast that the form must be signed under penalty of perjury, transforming honest accounting mistakes or forgotten transactions into potential felony charges. This enforcement push is supercharged by new 1099-DA data reporting from exchanges, which will give the agency automated, comprehensive insight into user activity.
Andrew Gordon, TFTC: A Bitcoin Podcast:
- It's a two-page form that they have to fill out. And it asks for all of the transaction history going back to when they first got into crypto.
- And they have to sign this form under penalty of perjury.
Parallel to this audit offensive, the Justice Department is criminalizing the development of privacy tools. Lauren Rodriguez detailed on What Bitcoin Did how FBI agents raided her home to arrest her husband, Keone, a co-founder of the non-custodial Samurai Wallet. Federal prosecutors pursued money laundering charges despite having received written guidance from FinCEN, Treasury’s own financial crimes unit, stating the wallet was not a regulated money service business because it never took custody of funds.
This legal attack establishes a precedent that building privacy-preserving Bitcoin software is a prosecutable act, regardless of existing regulatory clarity. The goal, Rodriguez argues, is not justice but winning - stifling innovation through fear.
These fronts are connected by a broader state objective: total financial visibility. As noted on Bitcoin And, regulatory crackdowns, like Canada’s mass revocation of crypto business licenses, use anti-money laundering rhetoric to justify sweeping surveillance. The underlying aim is control over digital commerce and ensuring the state gets its tax cut from every transaction.
The pincer movement is clear: one arm uses tax forms and exchange data to squeeze individuals, while the other uses felony charges to eliminate the tools that provide financial privacy. The war is not on crime, but on opacity.


