BlackRock and Coinbase are pushing to alter Bitcoin’s core rules. At OP Next, their representatives voiced support for BIP 361, a proposal to freeze legacy addresses ahead of quantum threats. The target: unspent coins from Bitcoin’s early years, including Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched stash.
The argument centers on security. Marty Bent, co-host of Rabbit Hole Recap, said the institutions claim they want to protect the network from quantum theft. But the method - locking coins by default unless owners upgrade - would break Bitcoin’s principle of unchangeable ownership. "This is double-speak for stealing coins," Bent argued.
"They’re not preparing for quantum computing. They’re preparing for control."
- Matt Odell, Rabbit Hole Recap
Six weeks after Jameson Lopp floated freezing Satoshi’s coins to prevent quantum theft, BlackRock’s stance gives the idea institutional weight. But where Lopp framed it as defense, BlackRock’s backing suggests a different motive: a clean, auditable ledger that fits within regulated custody frameworks.
Meanwhile, Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy accelerates its Bitcoin bid through STRC, a preferred equity paying 11.5% dividends. The product has pulled in $2.7 billion in two weeks, funding aggressive accumulation. Van Spencer notes Saylor is on pace to buy 600,000 BTC this year - making MicroStrategy a de facto permanent bid.
"Every dollar of STRC issued eats into MSTR’s equity. This isn’t innovation - it’s financial engineering."
- Nick Carter, Bankless
The tension is clear. One faction wants Bitcoin to remain an immutable, decentralized store of value. The other wants it shaped for institutional adoption - even if that means rewriting the past.

