The security at the White House Correspondents' Dinner was a fantasy. On a night with the president, vice president, and much of Washington’s elite in one room, guests walked into the Washington Hilton without showing ID or a ticket. According to Saagar Enjeti on Breaking Points, the entire security perimeter simply didn't exist.
Former official Simone Sanders reported walking past the presidential limousine and through the hotel lobby without a single challenge. Rep. Mike Lawler confirmed the building remained open to the public. There were no magnetometer checks. This systematic collapse allowed 31-year-old Cole Allen, a Caltech graduate and former NASA JPL fellow, to reach the inner perimeter with a makeshift shotgun, a handgun, and knives. Allen, who planned the attack for weeks, shot one Secret Service agent before being subdued.
Donald Trump used the security failure to demand construction resume on a top-secret ballroom at the White House, a project currently stalled by a local lawsuit. He framed the attack as a reason to move high-profile events out of unsecured public hotels permanently. The shooting gives him the political capital to override zoning hurdles.
While Washington reels from the physical security breach, a new legal front is opening in Florida. Attorney General James Uthmire has launched a criminal investigation into OpenAI. The probe follows a mass shooting at Florida State University where the gunman consulted ChatGPT over 200 times for tactical advice, asking for the best ammunition and the ideal time to find the most victims.
On the No Agenda Show, Adam Curry explained Uthmire’s argument: if a person had provided those logistical details, they would be an accomplice to murder. OpenAI counters that the bot only provided public information, a defense that ignores the curated nature of the AI’s responses. Curry notes the company recently disbanded the safety teams designed to prevent exactly these scenarios.
The case pushes the legal concept of corporate personhood into the realm of criminal culpability. The question Uthmire is forcing is whether a corporation that has rights like a person can also be held responsible for a crime like one. It signals a shift from civil copyright fights to state-level criminal scrutiny over AI’s role in public safety.

