California’s prolonged vote count is fueling fraud allegations from grassroots activists and shifting the outcome of critical races.
According to Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak on the No Agenda Show, local activists report a 24,000-vote drop in Los Angeles where one mayoral candidate allegedly received zero votes - a statistical anomaly they argue points to foul play. They claim Governor Newsom’s policies removed signature verification, creating a vacuum for “airdropped” ballots.
“The slow count itself is the mechanism for the steal.”
- Adam Curry, No Agenda Show
While establishment media dismisses these claims as election denial, the late tally is demonstrably altering results. Breaking Points analyst Dave Weigel correctly predicted this pattern. In the LA mayoral race, Nithya Raman is closing the gap on Spencer Pratt as mail ballots favor Democrats. In the governor's race, Democrat Tom Steyer is gaining on Republican Steve Hilton, making a Democratic shutout a coin flip.
This dynamic extends down-ballot. Progressive Randy Vega leads in CA-20 despite over $5 million in attack ads, and incumbent Doris Matsui narrowly trails challenger Mae Vang in CA-07 with many Democratic-leaning ballots left to count.
Meanwhile, media scrutiny of candidates is under fire for selective rigor. On Breaking Points, Ryan Grim critiqued the New York Times for running a story on progressive challenger Graham Platner based largely on allegations from Lindsay Fifield, a Republican operative who worked for Nikki Haley and the Heritage Foundation. Krystal Ball argued similar deep-dive opposition research wouldn't be applied to establishment figures like Chuck Schumer.
“The bar for corroboration was lowered because the alleged offenses were low-level.”
- Ryan Grim, Breaking Points
The convergence of fraud claims and demonstrable vote shifts frames the primary as a legitimacy crisis. As the count drags on, the final results may be viewed through a partisan lens long after the winners are declared.

