Data centers become a fight over who gets a say
- Opposition to nearby data centers rose sharply as residents worried about bills, water and changes to their communities.
- Politicians are turning those local concerns into a cross-party argument about who benefits from AI infrastructure.
- Abdul El-Sayed wants public oversight to reach far beyond local permits.
A year ago, Americans were nearly evenly split on whether they wanted a data center near home. By August 2026, 75% opposed one, according to polling cited by Nathaniel Whittemore on The AI Daily Brief. The facilities powering AI have become a local political issue: residents worry about electricity bills, water supplies, disruption to their towns and whether the projects will bring jobs.
The shift has been quick enough to change the tone of state politics. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro praised Amazon’s planned $20 billion data-center investment in June 2025, then tightened rules 14 months later, citing threats to clean air, water access and residential utility bills. Whittemore argued that AI is inheriting a broader distrust of tech companies, rather than creating public skepticism on its own.
In Ohio, Sherrod Brown attacked Jon Husted over support for data centers and tax breaks, saying projects had moved ahead without enough local input. Sarah Longwell, on The Ezra Klein Show, said the issue grew from a concern in local races in 2025 to a dominant one in 2026. In her focus groups, residents connected the projects to higher power bills, community disruption and uncertainty about jobs.
In Texas, candidate Gina Hinojosa has made that tension part of her case against Gov. Greg Abbott. She said Project Matador, described by her as the world’s largest data center, secured city water in drought-prone Amarillo while residents were told their supplies could be cut first if water ran short.
Near a rural Dallas-area community, she said, residents were concerned about seven planned data centers, including one on a 900-acre site. Hinojosa argues that state leaders are favoring tech investors over residents; Abbott declined an interview request.
The opposition is not confined to one party. Whittemore cited a YouGov poll in which 47% of Trump voters opposed a data center near them. On The Ezra Klein Show, Nate Silver said polling showed opposition around 80% to 20%, and that only 3% wanted AI development accelerated while 60% wanted it slowed. Silver said later analysis could test whether data-center locations predicted Republican underperformance; he did not say the effect was already established.
Abdul El-Sayed, a Michigan Senate candidate interviewed on Breaking Points, said data centers and AI come up at nearly every town hall. He tied the issue to utility costs and water use, and proposed protections for both, union construction, transparent community-benefit agreements and a local and state pause on projects until federal safeguards are in place. He also called for an AI regulator and limits on using AI to fire workers or deny health care.
The proposals differ, but the argument underneath them is becoming harder for officials to avoid: residents want a say before projects reshape their communities, and want to know who will pay for the power and water they use.
Source Intelligence
- Deep dive into what was said in the episodes
10/29/26: Bibi Says Arabs Rigged Elections, Abdul Exclusive Interview • Oct 29
- Abdul El-Sayed said data centers and AI raise both utility costs and control concerns, especially for young people and rural communities. He proposed democratic oversight, an AI regulator, limits on AI firing workers or denying care, union construction, water protections, and community power to reject projects.
Also discussed on this episode: (18)
Iran (3)
- The Wall Street Journal reported U.S. warnings to Gulf states to prepare for renewed strikes on Iran, possibly targeting energy infrastructure. Axios reported Qatar’s proposal for UN inspections in exchange for limited sanctions relief; Iran rejected the terms.
- The host argued that Netanyahu’s caretaker status and Trump’s anticipated midterm losses could make renewed war more attractive to both leaders. The host said JD Vance had contacted Iranian officials, but judged a deal unlikely.
- A host cited oil above $110 per barrel and forecast national gasoline prices of at least $4.30 per gallon on Election Day, warning that renewed strikes could push prices higher.
Elections (9)
- Netanyahu accused Arab polling stations of election theft, alleging cash payments, threats, double identities, and ballot discrepancies. The host noted that Likud faces a separate Qatari bribery case and said Netanyahu has repeatedly cited security concerns to delay court hearings.
- Krystal argued that Israeli leaders and U.S. supporters celebrate Arab citizens’ voting when it bolsters Israel’s democratic image, then smear Arab voters when their turnout matters. She said an anti-Netanyahu coalition with Arab parties is politically blocked by Jewish-majority opposition.
- Krystal cited polling that found 80% of Jewish Israelis opposed a governing coalition with Arab parties. She said this undermines claims of equal political inclusion, especially given the lack of equal rights for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.
- Abdul El-Sayed said polls showed him leading Michigan’s Senate race by six or seven points, but he was campaigning as if ten points behind. He said voters focused on affordability, health care, corruption, and political chaos.
- Abdul El-Sayed said Michigan voters described spending $80 to fill a tank and struggling to afford groceries. He pointed to rising insurance premiums and utility rates, and blamed Trump’s tariffs, Iran war, and health-care cuts for worsening household costs.
- Haley Stevens reaffirmed support for Abdul El-Sayed but said she would not campaign with him; her fiancé endorsed Republican Mike Rogers. Abdul said his coalition includes voters opposing Trump, the Iran war, tariffs, and limits on rights and health care.
- Abdul El-Sayed said seniors facing rising property taxes often rely on their children to keep their homes, while also backing more housing, zoning reform, and limits on speculation and short-term rentals. He blamed federal disinvestment for shifting infrastructure costs onto local taxpayers.
- Republicans and RFK Jr. attacked Abdul El-Sayed’s Muslim and Arab identity; RFK Jr. claimed Arabs produce no major scientific or literary achievements. Abdul, who said he holds two doctoral degrees and has published scientific research, called the remarks self-revealing bigotry.
- A poll cited by Krystal found 38% of voters would be less likely to support a Muslim candidate. Abdul El-Sayed said he expects Michigan voters to reject religious smears and focus instead on jobs, health care, clean air and water, and housing costs.
Israel (2)
- Mark Levin urged Israeli right-wing voters to turn out against leftists and Arabs, while Moshe Feinglin said Israel should judge foreign critics by its own religious standards. Krystal described this rhetoric as choosing Jewish ethno-national identity over democratic inclusion.
- The Jerusalem Post reported that Trump wants Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich removed from Israel’s government because settler violence undermines his regional vision. The host said Netanyahu could not form a government without them.
Immigration (1)
- Abdul El-Sayed said Biden and Harris should have enforced tougher border security and better tracked who entered the country. He distinguished border enforcement by Customs and Border Protection from ICE’s internal enforcement, which he said Trump has weaponized against the Constitution.
Health (1)
- Abdul El-Sayed defended access to health care as a rights issue, saying treatment decisions should rest with patients, doctors, and parents for minors. He called “defund the police” an inadequate slogan and backed law-enforcement staffing alongside behavioral-health response and violence-prevention programs.
Regulation (1)
- Abdul El-Sayed opposed banning sports betting but favored sharply limiting its advertising, placement, and ties to sports entertainment to reduce gambling harms. He said restrictions should protect people with problem gambling from targeted marketing.
AI Infrastructure (1)
- The host said a New Mexico hospital system had been hacked and noted Bill Gates’s warning that humanity may face its most chaotic 20 years. The transcript gave no details about the cyberattack or Gates’s reasoning.
10/26/26: Obama Rips Trump, Bibi Accused Of Treason, Oil Market On The Brink, Pentagon Doomsday Warning • Oct 26
- Ryan said data centers have become a political liability because voters living closer to them are more likely to support Democrats, despite many facilities being located in rural areas. Trump defended Elon Musk’s planned Memphis data centers by emphasizing jobs and potential profits.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)
Elections (5)
- Krystal said Barack Obama’s support for Abdul El-Sayed and Medicare for All marks a shift from defending party establishment power toward accepting the party’s leftward direction. Ryan said El-Sayed framed the Affordable Care Act as a starter home, making broader coverage its next step.
- Ryan said New York Governor Kathy Hochul saw the energy behind Zohran Mamdani’s movement firsthand during a public outing where residents flocked to Mamdani, not Hochul. Ryan argued that Mamdani’s popularity and Obama’s support for progressive candidates signal a new phase for Democrats.
- Donald Trump attacked Obama’s support for Abdul El-Sayed with anti-Muslim language, calling El-Sayed a jihadist and urging Michigan voters to back Mike Rogers. Krystal called Trump’s remarks about Somali immigrants racist after Trump claimed they avoid work and steal.
- Mike Rogers refused to say whether he identifies as a MAGA Republican during recent interviews, according to Ryan. Trump campaigned for Rogers in Michigan, while Krystal questioned whether the endorsement would help a candidate who appeared uncomfortable embracing MAGA.
- Ryan said early-voting data showed stronger Democratic enthusiasm, including more first-time or infrequent voters, while Krystal cautioned that party registration cannot show how independents or Republican defectors will vote. Florida data showed 80,000 Democrats and 120,000 Republicans had already voted who voted on Election Day in 2024.
Energy (6)
- Gas prices jumped sharply in Midwestern battleground states just before early voting, adding pressure on Republicans. Michigan’s average rose from $4.44 to $4.77 in two days, while Ohio prices climbed 39 cents; Michigan households were paying nearly $650 more, according to CNN.
- Trump said the United States was making enormous sums from the Iran conflict even as households faced higher fuel costs, and said he did not care if that angered voters. Krystal argued the beneficiaries were oil executives and shareholders, not consumers paying more at the pump.
- Oil analyst Brett Erickson said the White House’s claim that Iran loses $500 million daily to the U.S. blockade was fabricated. He said the Foundation for Defense of Democracies estimated $435 million daily, including $139 million from oil exports, but Iran had sold stored oil at elevated prices before its seaborne supply began running low.
- Brett Erickson said the war and shipping risks pushed Brent crude to $117.40, diesel into the mid-$6 range, and gasoline to $4.29 a gallon. Chinese imports had fallen by 1.5 million barrels per day, but replacing lost Iranian supply could require roughly 2 million additional barrels daily from other producers.
- Brett Erickson said Iran’s oil wells would not explode from being shut in, rejecting Donald Trump’s claim that they would fail within two weeks. Iran had shut wells during COVID and restored production without notable problems; current output had been reduced toward domestic needs and available exports.
- A Pentagon plan described by Fox News would prepare every major U.S. base to operate for 90 days without civilian power, fuel, water, or outside supply chains. Ryan said the administration had weakened energy security by gutting the Inflation Reduction Act, which funded energy projects including batteries and renewables.
Israel (1)
- Ryan and Krystal said Israeli military chief Eyal Zamir resisted a directive from Benjamin Netanyahu that could trigger a confrontation with Iran before Israel’s election. Avigdor Lieberman asked Israel’s attorney general to investigate Netanyahu for treason, alleging he risked soldiers’ lives for political survival.
War (1)
- Ryan said Netanyahu may be trying to provoke or restart conflict with Iran because polls suggest he could lose power, while Krystal noted that Israel’s military chief warned a strike could disrupt the election. Trump said there would be no strike that day and repeatedly ruled out an attack before the U.S. midterms.
Safety (1)
- Krystal and Ryan warned that AI tools are making sophisticated cyberattacks accessible to low-skill actors, with a PHP vulnerability reportedly exposed by a simple prompt and affecting 70% of websites. They urged basic security and household preparedness; the U.K. prime minister separately advised people to keep food and water at home.
Nate Silver Predicts a ‘Momentous’ Midterm • Oct 27
- Nate Silver said polling suggested opposition to data centers was about 80% to 20%; on AI development, about 3% wanted acceleration, 60% wanted it slowed, and 30% were unsure. He said later analysis could test whether data-center construction locations predicted Republican underperformance.
Also discussed on this episode: (18)
Elections (17)
- Nate Silver put Democrats above a 70% chance of winning the Senate, with competitive races extending into Republican-leaning states including Kansas, Texas, Iowa, and Alaska. Democrats needed to defend their current competitive seats and flip at least four Republican-held seats.
- Nate Silver said a poor midterm for Trump could make him a super lame duck and effectively start the 2028 campaign once votes are counted. Silver expects AI, alongside the economy, to be a major issue in 2028.
- Nate Silver described the midterm environment as an 11-point shift against the president's party, compared with an average shift of 7.5 points. That swing could turn a state Trump won by 11 points, such as Ohio, into a toss-up.
- Nate Silver credited Democratic prospects to a strong national environment and, in several key races, stronger candidates facing weaker Republicans. Silver said candidate quality might move results by as much as five points; he flagged Susan Collins's history of beating her polls by nine points as a reason to worry about Maine.
- Nate Silver said Democratic polling strength has been concentrated in redder states, where Democrats often chose more moderate or independent-minded candidates. He also pointed to fuel costs and possible voter backlash near data centers as explanations for the pattern.
- Nate Silver said social-media visibility does not reliably track candidate performance. Midterm outcomes depend on turnout from both parties and persuasion among roughly 15% of voters who could plausibly swing; high-profile campaigns may also draw Republicans to the polls.
- Nate Silver warned that a shared polling error of three or four points could flip several close Senate races. He said polls were unusually accurate in 2018 and 2022, while New Jersey and Virginia polls the previous year underestimated Democrats by five to ten points.
- Nate Silver said the 2024 Iowa poll showing Kamala Harris ahead by three points was 13 to 15 points off, despite Ann Selzer's strong reputation. He argued that polls now function partly as models because pollsters adjust samples and turnout assumptions rather than simply reporting a raw snapshot.
- Nate Silver said polls that rely on stated enthusiasm for voting tend to produce more Democratic results than methods using other turnout signals. Early voting data showed low-propensity voters, defined as voting in no more than one of the past three elections, leaning Democratic so far.
- Nate Silver said Democratic results could shape the party's debate over progressive versus moderate candidates, but election-night clarity may matter more than narrow margins to most voters. He argued voters can weigh both a candidate's chance of winning and how much that candidate would advance their priorities.
- Ezra Klein described a rising class of Democratic talent, including James Talarico, John Ossoff, Abdul El-Sayed, and Pete Buttigieg, as more shaped by Obama-era politics and modern communication. Nate Silver said Obama's political style helped establish a model that later candidates adopted.
- Nate Silver's model gave Democrats more than a 90% chance of winning the House, but projected an average gain of only 22 seats because redistricting and voter self-sorting have left fewer swing districts. He said Republican map changes had effectively removed three Democratic seats, while a larger wave could overwhelm vulnerable incumbents.
- Nate Silver attributed Florida's shift toward Republicans mainly to migration, with a smaller contribution from a self-reinforcing decline in the state Democratic Party. He said Democratic voter-registration gains seen elsewhere, including the Midwest and Pennsylvania, had not appeared in Florida.
- Nate Silver linked Trump's declining approval to gas prices and economic anxiety, with a sharper drop during the 2025 tariff announcement he called Liberation Day. Silver said the Iran war and rising fuel costs hurt Republicans, while Trump resisted criticism of data centers partly because of competition with China and fear of an AI-driven stock-market collapse.
- Nate Silver said Trump staffed his administration with people unlikely to challenge him, citing Pete Hegseth and the departure of tariff critic Gary Cohn as examples. Silver argued that Trump could have strengthened Republicans in Texas by backing John Cornyn, but instead prioritized personal loyalty and public credit.
- Nate Silver described the combination of an Iran war, financial-market risk, and rapid AI development as a dangerous test for an aging lame-duck president. Silver said a crisis could be harder to manage with Trump surrounded by loyalists, while the AI transition could remake work within a few years.
- Nate Silver said political money is overrated in high-profile races, where candidates face diminishing returns, but matters more in lower-profile contests. He estimated that Republicans' apparent fundraising advantage translated into roughly even ad exposure, while Elon Musk had put hundreds of millions of dollars into Republican midterm efforts.
History (1)
- Nate Silver recommended Robert Gordon's The Rise and Fall of American Growth, Kate Hall's You Can Just Do Things, and Al Alvarez's The Biggest Game in Town. Silver said Gordon traces major U.S. gains to roughly 1870-1970, while Hall's book stresses agency and direct communication.
What Hundreds of Focus Groups With Trump Voters Revealed • Oct 23
- Longwell says data centers became a major local concern in 2025 and a dominant issue in 2026 because residents fear higher power bills, community disruption, and lost jobs. In Ohio, Sherrod Brown attacked Jon Husted over support for data centers, tax breaks, and projects residents felt had been approved without local input.
Also discussed on this episode: (15)
Elections (4)
- Sarah Longwell attributes Trump’s falling approval to his unilateral tariffs and the Iran war, decisions voters connect directly to him because he made them without Congress. Voters expected lower prices and fewer wars; instead, both choices intensified the costs they already felt.
- Longwell says many Trump voters saw a businessman who could make deals and break a sclerotic system, an image reinforced by The Apprentice. They expected Trump to use that supposed “secret sauce” to lower prices, even though he had no way to guarantee cheaper groceries.
- Longwell says Trump damaged trust with voters who expected him to release information about Epstein, JFK, and aliens as part of a promise of transparency. She describes a split between an “America First” faction that broke with Trump over Iran and a MAGA establishment that follows his lead.
- Longwell says swing voters respond to Democrats who show personal concern through constituent services and grounded communication. She cites Jon Ossoff, Josh Shapiro, and Pete Buttigieg as examples, while saying some committed Trump supporters remain loyal because of cultural issues and anti-Democratic identity.
Inflation (2)
- Longwell says voters judge economic policy through what they pay at the store, not policy details: one 2024 Trump voter said ground beef had reached $9 and was $2 more than before. Voters who backed Trump expected “America First” to mean the government would prioritize their household needs.
- The host argues that years of price increases have made each new rise politically painful even though current inflation is around 3%, not 7%. Longwell says Democrats must explain concrete affordability choices and acknowledge constraints such as the national debt and high borrowing costs rather than promising an instant fix.
Media (2)
- Longwell says less politically engaged voters increasingly receive news through algorithmic feeds rather than seeking it out. They may encounter politics alongside sports or entertainment, then form an opinion without knowing where the information came from or checking whether it is true.
- Longwell recommends three novels: Intermezzo by Sally Rooney, Stoner by John Williams, and The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver. She describes Stoner as a particularly strong work of fiction that had been reissued after falling out of print.
Corruption (2)
- Longwell says corruption became more salient as voters struggled economically and saw Trump focus on personal projects and self-enrichment. A Fox News poll in October found more voters concerned about government corruption than about prices, health care, Iran, or immigration; partisan whataboutism also helped push the issue into public debate.
- Longwell says Jon Ossoff makes complex corruption allegations easier to follow by walking voters through one story at a time. In the speech excerpt, Ossoff linked Trump associates’ Russian oil negotiations to friends who had invested in Trump family businesses, including a crypto venture and an Albanian resort project.
War (1)
- Longwell says many voters expected the Iran war to resemble the brief US operation in Venezuela, but now see the conflict as prolonged and out of Trump’s control. Younger Trump voters, especially those under 35, often blame Netanyahu for drawing Trump into the war, a frame Longwell says can shade into antisemitism.
Health (1)
- Longwell says health care costs dominate focus groups across the political spectrum, including among rural, working-class, and non-college voters. She expects growing support for some form of universal coverage as Medicaid cuts and unstable individual insurance markets make the system harder to afford and navigate.
Immigration (2)
- Longwell says Trump still performs better on immigration than on affordability or the Iran war because voters credit him with closing the border. Many support removing dangerous criminals but oppose sweeping enforcement against long-term residents, workers, and people they see as following the rules.
- Longwell says voters are angered by ICE operations at schools, masked agents, and the detention of people they consider innocent or law-abiding. The host argues that visible government violence and anonymity created a broader warning about political disorder, which could motivate anti-ICE voters to turn out even if immigration remains a Republican strength.
Labor (1)
- Longwell says voters want politicians to explain AI’s risks and benefits, especially the prospect that it could replace their jobs, rather than simply endorse or reject data centers. She favors candidates who can admit uncertainty, show they will not leave people behind, and speak credibly to a changing economy.

Nathaniel Whittemore
Introducing How We Got Here -- NLW's new podcast • Oct 26
- Public support for local data center development collapsed in a single year. Whittemore cited polling showing 75 percent of Americans opposed a data center near their home by August 2026, up from 42 percent in August 2025.
- Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro praised Amazon's $20 billion data center plan in June 2025, but restricted development 14 months later. Shapiro cited threats to clean air, water access, and residential utility bills as justification for stricter regulations.
- Data center opposition spans partisan lines and threatens election strategy. Whittemore noted a YouGov poll where 47 percent of Trump voters opposed nearby data centers, while a Republican memo warned the issue could cost the party an Ohio Senate seat.
- Public backlash against AI infrastructure reflects a decade-long collapse in institutional trust toward the broader tech sector. Whittemore argues that generative AI did not create this skepticism independently, but rather inherited tech's existing trust deficit.
- Gallup polling showed positive views of the computer industry dropped from 75 percent in 2017 to 48 percent in 2026. Pew surveys similarly tracked positive views of tech falling from 71 percent in 2015 to 50 percent in 2019.
Gina Hinojosa Believes She’s the One Who Can Finally Flip Texas • Oct 24
- Gina Hinojosa makes data centers a central case against Greg Abbott, arguing that state leaders favor tech investors over residents. In Amarillo, she says Project Matador secured city water for a data center despite drought concerns and residents being told their water could be cut first.
- Gina Hinojosa says seven data centers, including one on a 900-acre site, are planned near a rural Dallas-area community where MAGA voters invited her to answer questions. She supports background checks and opposes permitless carry, while criticizing culture-war politics as a distraction from corporate power.
- Gina Hinojosa credits women’s support for her polling strength, citing mothers concerned about public schools, health care, and data centers disrupting their communities. She says her campaign is winning in six major polls over five weeks but is not taking any demographic for granted.
Also discussed on this episode: (16)
Elections (6)
- Gina Hinojosa is running to defeat Republican Greg Abbott, who could win a fourth term; a victory would make Hinojosa the first Latino governor and the first Democrat elected to the office since the 1990s.
- Gina Hinojosa says voters began connecting with her campaign once they learned who she was; her name recognition rose from 20% or less at launch to 80%, with 20% of voters still unreached.
- Gina Hinojosa says her coalition includes Democrats, Republicans, independents, and Trump supporters, including Latinos who backed Trump. She rejects moderating her message and instead pitches economic populism to voters dissatisfied with both parties.
- Gina Hinojosa says a governor could build bipartisan support for measures to save women’s lives, even without control of the legislature. She also accuses Greg Abbott of delaying the state maternal-mortality report until after the election.
- Gina Hinojosa says Texas Democrats have an unusually broad statewide slate, with candidates running for every state legislative and congressional seat. She argues national investment could help win the governorship and block Republican redistricting plans.
- Gina Hinojosa argues that Latino voters are central to a possible Democratic win and says national Democrats should invest more in Texas. She cites Beto O’Rourke’s 2018 Latino-vote share as a benchmark and says matching it would put her in a winning position.
Education (2)
- Gina Hinojosa entered politics after her school district tried to close her son’s neighborhood school. She says state funding pressures drove the closures, and she spent 10 years in the Texas House fighting for public schools.
- Gina Hinojosa initially planned to run for comptroller to oppose school vouchers, which she argues divert public-school funds to private schools. She entered the governor’s race after no one else stepped forward to challenge Greg Abbott.
Immigration (4)
- Gina Hinojosa grew up in Brownsville in a cross-border family; her parents were legal-aid lawyers who represented farm workers. A childhood memory of poverty across the border shaped her belief that a strong middle class defines the American dream.
- Gina Hinojosa attributes the Rio Grande Valley’s Republican shift to anger over chaotic border crossings and Trump’s economic promises. She says Latino voters now feel anger and fear over ICE raids, racial profiling, high costs, and enforcement incidents involving citizens.
- Gina Hinojosa supports border security and a path to legalization for long-settled, law-abiding residents, while arguing they should not be treated like recent arrivals awaiting vetting. She opposes SB4 but says a Republican-controlled legislature makes repeal unlikely.
- Gina Hinojosa says she would use the governor’s platform and the courts to defend Texans against federal enforcement abuses. She calls for ICE activity in Texas to stop and cites masked agents, inadequate accountability, and deadly incidents as sources of danger.
Regulation (1)
- Gina Hinojosa says Elon Musk benefits from Greg Abbott’s policies and wants Musk to follow the same tax rules as other Texans, not leave the state. She cites tax breaks for Tesla’s Texas factory, state cash for Starbase, and Abbott’s intervention in a broadband contract.
Macro (1)
- Gina Hinojosa argues that Texas’s business-friendly reputation has not delivered broad prosperity: she cites high numbers of uninsured residents, unaffordable electricity, and bankruptcies, plus small businesses and school districts struggling to operate.
Labor (1)
- Gina Hinojosa calls her politics economic populism, focused on working people’s power against large corporations rather than left-right labels. She connects that tradition to the Farmers Alliance’s fight against railroads and says culture-war battles divide voters without producing results.
Health (1)
- Gina Hinojosa says she continued a pregnancy after doctors diagnosed trisomy 18, despite being told the fetus was not expected to survive; the baby died at birth. She calls abortion a human-rights and health-care issue and says Texas’s restrictions endanger women.


