Price:

BUSINESS

Flock Safety's cameras don't reduce crime

Monday, July 20, 2026 · from 1 podcast
  • Flock Safety’s surveillance fails to lower murder rates despite massive deployment.
  • Police and corporate insiders profit while cities bypass public oversight.
  • Whistleblowers reveal data misuse and covert access to private spaces.

Flock Safety’s promise collapses under its own data. In Harris County, Texas - one of the most surveilled in the nation - more than 500 murders occurred in 2025 despite over 3,700 license plate readers. The technology isn’t delivering safety. It’s delivering control.

Tucker Carlson argues the trade of privacy for safety is a fraud. Ben Jordan, a whistleblower and former Flock critic, contends the real goal isn’t crime reduction but corporate profit through government contracts. He notes Flock’s business model depends on maximizing deployments, not measurable public safety outcomes.

"A police officer costs a city about $7 million over a career, while a Flock contract costs about $2,500."

- Tucker Carlson, The Tucker Carlson Show

The financial logic drives adoption. But the oversight evaporates. Jordan highlights a revolving door: police officials who approve multimillion-dollar Flock contracts often land high-paying jobs at the company. Contracts are signed in secret, bypassing city councils and public debate.

Flock’s "Falcon" cameras use AI to log bumper stickers, roof racks, and vehicle damage - building a searchable database of daily movement. While the company claims it doesn’t sell data, Jordan says he’s seen internal price sheets suggesting otherwise. Taxpayers fund the system and lose their privacy twice.

"Flock employees accessed cameras inside a private community center, viewing footage of a daycare and a children’s gymnastics room over 1,000 times."

- Ben Jordan, The Tucker Carlson Show

The intrusion isn’t theoretical. An audit in Georgia revealed corporate employees - not law enforcement - repeatedly accessed footage from private spaces during "product demos." Former Rhode Island officer Noel Pichardo blew the whistle after refusing to participate in what he saw as a Fourth Amendment violation. As drone surveillance expands, the public is waking up - but the grid is already live.

Source Intelligence

- Deep dive into what was said in the episodes

Whistleblower Reveals the Largest Mass Surveillance Operation in History and the Coming Slave StateJul 16

  • Carlson describes the financial incentive for cities to adopt surveillance tech. A police officer costs a city about $7 million over a career, while a Flock contract costs about $2,500.
  • Ben Jordan argues Flock Safety, a major surveillance vendor, lacks evidence its cameras reduce crime. He notes its business model is to maximize camera deployment for profit.
Also from this episode: (9)

Society (8)

  • Tucker Carlson argues that modern state surveillance has surpassed Orwell's 1984, using ubiquitous cameras and drones that also analyze biometrics and conversations.
  • Carlson cites Harris County, Texas as evidence surveillance fails to increase safety. The county has 3,700 license plate readers but recorded over 500 murders in 2025.
  • Jordan claims community policing and social trust, not surveillance, are proven to reduce crime. He cites studies showing dog ownership lowers crime because it increases neighbor interaction.
  • Jordan explains Flock cameras function as persistent GPS trackers. Police can add plates to a 'hot list' and receive real-time notifications without a warrant.
  • Jordan describes a specific Flock security failure. He found Flock law enforcement accounts for sale on the dark web from a Russian vendor lacking multi-factor authentication.
  • Jordan reports that Flock employees viewed cameras inside a private Jewish community center over a thousand times, focusing on areas like the daycare and children's gymnastics room.
  • Noel Pacheco, a former Rhode Island police officer, was suspended and forced to resign after publicly opposing Flock cameras. He lost $20,000 in pay and was banned from promotion.
  • Pacheco argues Flock's license plate tracking is a Fourth Amendment violation because it surveils everyone without suspicion, equating it to warrantless GPS tracking.

Politics (1)

  • Pacheco observed no reduction in crime in Pawtucket after Flock cameras were installed. He states criminals adapt while law-abiding citizens are tracked everywhere.