Kevin Warsh talks like a hawk, but Lawrence Lepard argues on BTC Sessions he's just looking for an excuse to cut rates before the election. Falling oil prices and the AI productivity narrative will provide that cover.
James Lavish, on What Bitcoin Did, contends the incoming Fed leadership will likely pivot to a 'trimmed mean PCE' inflation metric, filtering out volatile costs like energy and rent to claim inflation is cooling while consumers' actual costs remain high.
"The Fed's entire existence is a lie, tasked with getting citizens to accept inflation and money printing to keep the system running."
- Lawrence Lepard, BTC Sessions
The delinquency data exposes the bluff's fragility. Lavish points to New York Fed data showing 90-day credit card delinquencies matching 2008 crisis depths. Consumers are defaulting on cards to keep cars and homes.
Jack Mallers argues the Fed cannot raise rates without triggering a sovereign debt crisis. With U.S. debt at $40 trillion, a hike would paradoxically increase inflation by forcing the government to monetize the massive interest burden.
"Raising rates would increase inflation under fiscal dominance by boosting the government's interest burden, forcing further debt monetization."
- Jack Mallers, The Jack Mallers Show
Brent Donnelly, on Forward Guidance, sees the hawkish rhetoric as a standard script for a new Fed chair to establish credibility. He expects the Fed to return to its 'perma-forecast' of 2% inflation unless employment data stays unexpectedly hot.
The market is betting on a pivot. Lepard notes the CME FedWatch tool shows 70% odds of a rate increase this year, which he believes is wrong. The consensus, as Donnelly maps using LLMs, is that cuts are coming.




