Price:

Data center backlash moves from ballots to building rules

Nov 6, 2026Summary from 6 podcasts.
  • Local votes against data centers are pushing companies to negotiate over power, water and community benefits.
  • The likely fight is over the terms of construction, not an outright halt to AI infrastructure.
  • A national-security warning complicates calls to slow the buildout.

The backlash against data centers is moving from ballot boxes into the rules that govern where they can be built and what developers must provide. By the time Nathaniel Whittemore discussed the midterms on The AI Daily Brief, 43 of 44 data-center moratorium votes had passed. But he expects the bigger change to be tougher conditions on projects, rather than a nationwide stop sign.

The votes reflected a sharper concern about nearby facilities than about AI in the abstract. Pew polling cited by Whittemore found 44% of voters said AI was a very important issue, while 61% disliked candidates who supported local data centers. Candidates connected the projects to household electricity costs, water use and the question of who controls a community’s future.

Texas offers an early test of what that pressure means in office. Gina Hinojosa, who defeated Greg Abbott in the governor’s race, campaigned for a moratorium, an end to tax subsidies and protections for local access to electricity and water. Abbott had already paused new data-center permits pending an energy and environmental review. Whittemore says state and local officials can shape projects through permits, subsidies and access to resources, even without a sweeping federal AI law.

The emerging bargain, as Whittemore sees it, is that developers may keep building if they pay the full costs they impose. That could mean covering power and infrastructure, disclosing negotiations, recycling water and offering visible community benefits. Jason Calacanis made a similar point on This Week in Startups: companies need to show residents what they gain, not rely on promotional campaigns.

For one Meta project in El Paso, he noted, the company lists 300 permanent jobs and up to 4,000 construction workers at peak; he argued that more concrete commitments, such as a guaranteed annual tax payment, could make the local case stronger.

That approach would raise costs and could slow projects already facing constraints on power, grid connections, labor and equipment, according to research discussed on The AI Daily Brief. But it could also give companies a way to proceed with local consent. The point is no longer simply whether a project promises economic growth; communities are asking who pays for the infrastructure and who gets a lasting return.

There is a competing concern. On Macro Voices, Michael Every warned that blocking data centers deemed essential to national security could hand an advantage to China. He also questioned whether every announced project could be built given shortages of electricity, water, copper and chips. The conflict is now over how to balance that strategic race against the costs borne by the places asked to host it.

Source Intelligence

- Deep dive into what was said in the episodes

Why a Data Center Slowdown Benefits Big Tech • Nov 5

  • Democrats’ election sweep put the Senate, House, and most state governments under Democratic control for two years, including Texas, where data-center construction has been central to the boom. Public resistance is strong: 43 of 44 data-center moratorium votes passed, and incoming Governor Gina Hinojosa is expected to be less supportive than Greg Abbott.
  • Citrini Research argues that data-center construction faces compounding power, grid-connection, labor, supply, and permitting constraints, alongside turbine delays and rising input costs. New state policies may add municipal concessions, clean-energy requirements, ratepayer protections, and slower approvals, raising project costs without stopping construction outright.
  • Nathaniel Whittemore argues that local leaders could allow data centers to proceed in exchange for transparency, full payment for infrastructure and power costs, environmental safeguards, and community benefits. Incoming Texas Senator James Tallarico has called for companies to pay for energy, recycle water, and obtain residents’ consent.
Also discussed on this episode: (16)

Big Tech (2)

  • OpenAI says ChatGPT now handles search requests at 20% of Google’s volume, although Adam Fry counts any query that triggers a web search. Sundar Pichai said AI Mode queries are slowing Google search revenue growth because they monetize less effectively.
  • Adam Fry said ChatGPT ads have not hurt product usage, and that users’ limited backlash may encourage OpenAI to expand advertising. Nathaniel Whittemore argues that search growth could strengthen OpenAI’s advertising business.

Models (1)

  • GPT 6.2 Astra and GPT 6.2 Sol appeared on Google Cloud’s backend, which Nathaniel Whittemore says usually signals an imminent release. The coming model comparison is whether GPT 6.2 can beat Opus 5.5.

Coding (2)

  • Meta acquired Conductor, a startup that coordinates multiple coding agents running in parallel, to help build future coding products. Conductor founder Charlie Holtz teased a different approach to coding interfaces, while Meta’s MuseCode has drawn little attention.
  • OpenAI agreed to acquire Pierre Computer Company, whose open-source tools help teams store codebases and track changes. Codex already uses Pierre’s tools, and the acquisition could support OpenAI’s ambition to add integrated services and compete with GitHub.

Agents (2)

  • Meta’s and OpenAI’s coding acquisitions point to competition shifting toward agent products and the overall developer experience, rather than model quality alone. Nathaniel Whittemore says leading labs appear to be preparing for a market where frontier models become less differentiated.
  • JPMorgan and Bank of America said they would block agents from accessing customer accounts, citing the risk of mistakes. Lead Bank and Increase Bank are testing agent-specific accounts, spending controls, emergency lockouts, and APIs through fintech partnerships.

Enterprise (2)

  • Apple cut engineering employees’ daily AI spending caps from $300 to $200, with another reduction to $100 under consideration; non-engineers already face a $100 cap that could fall to $25. Apple’s policy conflicts with its push to use AI internally and sell AI features as a reason to upgrade.
  • Apple’s previous $300 daily employee limit represented more than $6,000 a month, while Uber set a $1,500 monthly limit in June. Peter Steinberger argues that individual spending caps may stop making sense as workers use agents that run ongoing loops and maintain whole codebases.

Biology (1)

  • Google’s drug-discovery spinoff Isomorphic Labs is reportedly raising $5 billion at a $50 billion valuation to expand its operations. The company builds on DeepMind’s AlphaFold work, and Demis Hassabis shifted to chairman partly to focus on scaling it.

Markets (1)

  • Investors reacted differently across the AI trade: the S&P 500 and Nasdaq rose while chip and neocloud stocks fell, and the Magnificent Seven gained $1 trillion in market value. Seema Shah warned that volatility would continue amid possible Iran-war escalation, a December shutdown, and Federal Reserve rate hikes.

AI Infrastructure (3)

  • Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft all spent below their third-quarter capital-expenditure targets after construction delays. Microsoft attributed a $5 billion shortfall to a rented facility that was not ready, while Oracle warned it might invoke force majeure over a New Mexico project’s power-connection problems.
  • Nathaniel Whittemore and market analysts argue that a slower build-out could help hyperscalers lower capital spending, protect margins, and preserve free cash flow while easing pressure on power, labor, and supply chains. Matt Farley says constrained data-center capacity could raise compute rents and make infrastructure scarcity a competitive moat.
  • The Hill reported that hyperscalers are discussing a shared data-center framework with environmental groups, potentially giving Democrats enforceable community and environmental commitments while offering companies cover to moderate spending plans. Jessica Lesson says the market’s split reaction across hyperscalers, chips, and neoclouds suggests AI weakness need not pull the entire market down.

Regulation (2)

  • Progressives including Abdul Saeed and Yasemin Ansari have backed an AI pause, while Bernie Sanders has proposed jailing people who develop AGI. Nathaniel Whittemore considers a federal pause unlikely under a pro-AI president and a veto threat, and says Democrats remain divided between moderates and the Democratic Socialists of America.
  • Nathaniel Whittemore expects more room for agreement on AI policy than the pause-versus-acceleration debate suggests, including possible liability for labs, safety-incident disclosures, and third-party audits. He argues that wider public debate is appropriate as model capabilities keep advancing.

How the Midterm Results Change AI • Nov 4

  • A Pew poll found AI ranked below the economy, democracy, and several other issues in voter importance. Opposition to local data centers was much broader than concern about AI as an abstract issue.
  • Pew found opposition to pro-data-center candidates across party lines, with stronger resistance among Democrats. Nathaniel Whittemore says the campaign issue was chiefly the local costs and control associated with data centers.
  • NBC exit polling found data centers mattered to voters, but ranked below immigration, Iran, cost of living, and corruption. Democrats were twice as likely as Republicans to cite data centers as a major voting factor.
  • Sherrod Brown and Abdul El-Sayed linked data centers to household costs, concentrated tech wealth, surveillance, and political power. Trump’s public defense of data centers left Republicans in tight races little room to break with him.
  • Ohio’s data-center plans gave Sherrod Brown a concrete campaign target: he attacked Jon Husted’s support for development and won back his Senate seat. Brown returned with 18 years of Senate experience and a sharper grievance against the tech industry after its spending against him.
  • Texas’s governor’s race created a major uncertainty for data-center developers: Gina Hinojosa defeated Greg Abbott after Abbott paused new permits pending an energy and environmental review. Hinojosa campaigned on a moratorium, ending tax subsidies, and protecting local electricity and water access.
  • Jon Ossoff made data centers a symbol of tech oligarchy, corruption, and rising household costs, and won a second Senate term. Whittemore says Ossoff had done little beyond headline-friendly investigations, but his campaign could push him toward a larger AI policy role.
  • Data-center developers now have to earn local consent by limiting nondisclosure agreements, covering their own infrastructure and electricity costs, and offering community benefits. Whittemore expects some new leaders to pair enforceable local protections with a workable path for projects.
Also discussed on this episode: (7)

Elections (3)

  • Nathaniel Whittemore says Democrats won control of both chambers after an 11-point national swing, flipping seats in Republican strongholds; they are unlikely to have a veto-proof supermajority.
  • Scott Wiener’s California House race put AI regulation in the spotlight; Wiener had sponsored SB 1047, whose provisions included developer liability and a mandatory kill switch. The bill influenced later California laws that became models for other states.
  • Abdul El-Sayed campaigned against AI through concerns about job loss, economic disruption, surveillance, AI-powered warfare, and loss of control. He also raised the possibility that AI could be used to create a biological weapon.

Regulation (2)

  • Nathaniel Whittemore expects Congress to avoid a sweeping federal AI framework or nationwide data-center moratorium, especially with Trump promising to veto Democratic legislation. He expects hearings and state-level restrictions to matter more immediately.
  • Whittemore sees bipartisan openings for whistleblower protections, required incident reporting, stronger model-builder liability, and legal requirements for frontier-model testing. He also expects debate over data sovereignty, export controls, pausing development, and limits on recursive self-improvement.

Models (1)

  • Whittemore argues that pressure for AI rules will rise as models gain capabilities, including capabilities for harmful uses. He sees broadly accepted baseline protections as a foundation for later, more contested rules.

AI Infrastructure (1)

  • Whittemore’s downside scenario is that expanding moratoriums and state actions cut off Wall Street funding, stall AI construction, bankrupt neoclouds, and trigger a wider downturn. A burst AI investment bubble could then shape the 2028 campaign alongside jobs, cybersecurity, and existential-risk concerns.

MacroVoices #557 Michael Every: The Blue Tsunami Lands on Markets... and Geopolitics • Nov 5

  • Every says proposed data-center pauses reflect concern about electricity bills, but the buildout also depends on available water, copper, chips, and power. He warns that blocking projects deemed essential to national security could surrender AI leadership to China, even as nuclear stocks fell with the AI trade.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)

Elections (2)

  • Michael Every says the Democratic takeover of both chambers will constrain Trump’s wars through funding and oversight, though the new Congress does not take office until January. The president retains vetoes and executive orders, and the Supreme Court’s rulings could shape the limits.
  • Every says Trump may turn to executive orders and other powers still within his control, while a third term is not a realistic route. He speculates that federally owned land could support new towns for young families, but says a new third party could emerge without gaining power.

Middle East (1)

  • Every sees a possible US withdrawal from the Middle East as a source of higher energy risk: Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, Israel, and Turkey could compete to fill the resulting vacuum. He says a US pullback would not create a strong case for sustainably lower energy prices.

Israel (1)

  • Every considers Israeli nuclear use a remote, last-resort risk, citing Israel’s restraint during the 1973 Yom Kippur War; he does not believe Israel has tactical nuclear weapons. He says India could be a future Israeli partner but would oppose nuclear threats.

Russia (1)

  • Every says a weaker Washington could make Russia less willing to negotiate over Ukraine, while Ukraine may keep striking Russian refineries. He sees a frozen conflict as the best plausible settlement and expects escalation to support refining margins and energy prices.

Trade (1)

  • Every argues that tariffs can support reindustrialization and preserve the industrial base needed for US military power, while their removal would lower costs and government revenue. He floats a deal with shared external tariffs on China and fewer tariffs within a broader US-Europe-aligned bloc.

Nation-State (1)

  • Every argues that US deindustrialization would weaken the military-industrial capacity behind the postwar international order. A US retreat could leave power vacuums and more room for rival states and international crime, while domestic opposition to wars may further limit Washington’s role.

Energy (2)

  • Every says fertilizer and grain prices have not yet reflected disruption around the Strait of Hormuz, citing agricultural-season timing, stock depletion, and demand destruction. He warns that sustained energy disruption or high sulfur prices could still feed through to food costs with a lag.
  • Masile calls the post-election oil selloff an overshoot driven mainly by fading risk premium, not a clear change in fundamentals. The oil decline followed expectations that election results would pressure Trump to end the war, but Masile says a settlement still depends on both sides agreeing.

Markets (5)

  • Every says the election has widened the range of possible fiscal outcomes: Washington could gridlock, or Democrats could propose generous spending bills that Trump might accept or oppose. He expects debt-ceiling brinkmanship, if isolated from other crises, to follow a familiar pattern of delay and eventual compromise.
  • Every says the election weakened the dollar amid uncertainty about future US policy, while gold may reflect expectations of more spending and a weaker currency. He cautions that the fiscal outlook remains unclear and that the market’s response to geopolitical risk may differ from the usual flight to the dollar.
  • Patrick Ceresna proposes a Marathon Petroleum call spread on the view that refinery constraints could support margins after an excessive selloff. The position risks $20 per share for up to $40 profit, with a $410 expiration breakeven.
  • Masile says the index rally masked weakness in AI infrastructure: Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon rose sharply, while semiconductors and related trades fell to fresh multi-month lows. Masile sees the AI trade still correcting and wants the Nasdaq back above its 50-day moving average before calling the reversal meaningful.
  • Masile says the dollar and Treasury yields stayed near pre-election ranges, leaving no confirmation of a major macro shift. Gold’s rebound followed a steep oversold decline; Masile treats it as a countertrend bounce, not evidence that a new bull market has begun.

Tucker Responds to the Republican Midterm Bloodbath • Nov 5

  • Carlson argues data centers became a winning Democratic issue because voters saw them as ugly, resource-intensive projects that could serve surveillance more than local communities; he says Greg Abbott backed them while his opponent campaigned against them.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)

Elections (7)

  • Tucker Carlson calls the Republican losses a broad rejection of the Trump administration: he cites Ohio, a Democratic sweep of Texas statewide offices, a possible Democratic Senate win in Mississippi, and an Alabama state-house seat won by a transgender Democrat.
  • Carlson says voters punished Republican leaders for treating their own supporters with contempt, citing Lindsey Graham’s sister’s Senate bid, Mike Rogers’s return after a previous loss, and Texas incumbents seeking fourth terms.
  • Carlson says the losses leave Republicans facing a generational Senate disadvantage: even a sweeping 2028 presidential win might not restore Senate control, and Congress cannot check Trump’s war powers until the new session begins.
  • Rich Baris says voters’ leading reasons for rejecting Republicans were ending the war, lowering living costs, putting America first, and changing the relationship with Israel. Baris says Republicans broke promises to avoid new Middle East wars and protect ordinary voters.
  • Carlson describes Trump’s 2024 coalition as a nationalist alliance that crossed racial and partisan lines, while Baris says it could have sustained Republican power for decades. Both argue that prioritizing foreign policy and identity fights fractured that coalition.
  • Baris says Republican gains among Jewish voters were small and that most Jewish voters opposed the Iran war; he reports Abdul El-Sayed won Michigan’s Jewish vote despite Republican attacks framing him as a threat. Baris calls the gains too small to justify alienating younger and other voters.
  • Baris blames Republican strategists and donors for breaking a coalition by sidelining dissenters and exploiting Charlie Kirk’s death to restore older political voices. He says attacks on Thomas Massie split votes, while costly Texas spending failed to overcome voters’ anger and demographic change.

Media (2)

  • Carlson accuses Fox News of helping sell the Iran war directly to Trump through programming he watched, and says nearly the entire lineup supported it. He also says Fox’s survey showed Iran mattered to only a small share of voters.
  • Carlson says political and media narratives rewrite events as they unfold, making later policy decisions less informed. He compares honest historical accounting to aviation crash investigations and argues that obscuring the reasons for past Middle East wars enabled repeated interventions.

War (1)

  • Carlson warns that Russia and Iran may exploit Trump’s domestic weakness while he retains executive authority, citing threats against the United States and its allies, including Ukraine, Europe, and the Gulf states.

Society (1)

  • Carlson argues that government should apply equal standards to individuals regardless of race or religion, and says both anti-Semitism and anti-white or anti-Muslim discrimination deserve opposition. He claims discrimination against white people remains embedded in university, hiring, and contracting policy.

Corruption (1)

  • Carlson calls the Epstein files a test of equal accountability, arguing that officials from either party must support their release. He questions Jared Kushner’s Middle East and Ukraine work alongside private fundraising, and says powerful figures may escape scrutiny while junior staff take the blame.

Psychology (2)

  • Carlson argues that Republican candidates weakened their appeal to men by projecting vanity, indecision, and performative toughness instead of restraint and decisiveness. He contrasts the party’s campaign imagery with candidates he portrays as more grounded and masculine.
  • Carlson says political drama and social-media framing can make people judge their lives by national events instead of relationships and daily circumstances. He argues that a slower political pace would give people room to think after years of crisis-driven attention.

Tucker Answers the Most Controversial Questions of 2026 • Oct 30

  • Tucker Carlson interprets Trump’s support for rural data centers as contempt for loyal voters, arguing that local communities bear the costs while technology companies gain wealth and residents risk losing jobs and autonomy.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)

Elections (6)

  • Tucker Carlson says the DSA differs culturally from Republicans but has not shown a clear alternative on Iran, taxes, or improving ordinary Americans’ lives; he rejects rewarding Republicans for letting Israel push the United States toward war with Iran.
  • Tucker Carlson supports forming a third party because he believes neither major party reflects majority preferences; he argues that ignoring those preferences for decades undermines democracy and risks unrest, while polling can reveal public views without governing by poll.
  • Tucker Carlson names Marjorie Taylor Greene, Joe Kent, and Thomas Massie as his three best politicians, praising their willingness to challenge party leaders; he says donor pressure and political campaigns pushed all three out of favor.
  • Tucker Carlson says Charlie Kirk filled the organizing role left by a weakened Republican National Committee through Turning Point, and argues Kirk’s murder and the donor-led takeover of the organization damaged the Republican coalition that elected Trump in 2024.
  • Tucker Carlson says Trump betrayed the issues he campaigned on and argues loyalty to a politician must be mutual; Carlson says he still feels affection for Trump but will not defend actions he believes are false or harmful.
  • Tucker Carlson says leadership starts with love for the people being led, using his brother Uncle Buck as an example of someone who enjoys being around people across backgrounds; Carlson says he would vote for him for president.

Religion (1)

  • Tucker Carlson calls James Talarico’s use of Christian identity blasphemous, arguing that Talarico’s politics oppose biblical Christianity; Carlson says Talarico’s public presence also gives him a strong sense of personal revulsion.

War (1)

  • Tucker Carlson says both parties support wars against Russia and Iran, and argues Democratic leaders helped set the Russia conflict in motion by backing Ukraine’s path toward NATO; he expects little change without pressure from voters who oppose the wars.

Corruption (2)

  • Tucker Carlson argues that money makes politicians vulnerable to donors who use government for private or foreign interests. He cites Miriam Adelson’s support for both Donald Trump and James Talarico, and says Fox regained pharmaceutical advertising after Carlson was fired.
  • Tucker Carlson argues the public owns the Epstein files and says the government has a duty to investigate people named in them; he links Trump’s resistance to releasing the records with lost voter trust.

Labor (1)

  • Tucker Carlson says widening inequality has made the United States cease to be a majority middle-class country, creating demand for socialism; he warns that economic upheaval may replace one wealthy elite with technocrats who control the state.

Psychology (2)

  • Tucker Carlson doubts political parties will learn from electoral losses without severe consequences, but says he sees people’s relationships, family ties, and loyalty becoming stronger and more honest in recent years.
  • Tucker Carlson distinguishes verbal fluency from wisdom, criticizing Ted Cruz as an example of someone whose high verbal ability does not guarantee sound judgment; Carlson says leadership requires willingness to sacrifice for the people being led.

Iran (1)

  • Tucker Carlson says he spoke with Trump repeatedly about Iran before the war and visited Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Jordan shortly beforehand; Carlson regrets not believing the war was imminent and predicts voters will punish it.

Why a Do-Nothing Congress could be great for markets | E2359 • Nov 5

  • The host cites an NBC exit poll finding that AI and data centers mattered to many voters, alongside more than $100 million in Democratic ads linking Republicans to big tech. DA Wallik says job fears make anti-data-center politics easier to sell than the case for technological progress.
Also discussed on this episode: (16)

Markets (2)

  • DA Wallik argues that divided government can steady markets by limiting policy shocks, even if Congress becomes gridlocked. Wallik attributes higher long-term interest rates more to political uncertainty and fiscal strain than to AI companies borrowing for data centers.
  • Tomas says permissionless synthetic markets could let people trade exposure to private-company valuations and specific milestones without buying shares. The speakers also discuss tokenized stocks and perpetual contracts, which could broaden access and improve price discovery while drawing regulatory scrutiny.

AI Infrastructure (3)

  • Elana Gold says political resistance to data centers will raise permitting hurdles, but power shortages still create opportunities for nuclear startups, more efficient chips, and new energy sources. She cites Elon Musk’s warning that the US could run short of power in 2026.
  • Tomas expects scarce compute to make AI usage metered like internet bandwidth, potentially reviving demand for bespoke software when unlimited inference is no longer affordable. He says model training consumes much of projected power capacity even as chip efficiency improves and demand grows faster.
  • Jason and Tomas see local inference as a hedge against cloud compute shortages: Jason would consider buying employees powerful local machines, while Tomas expects users to reserve cloud models for harder tasks. Tomas says a Stanford study found most AI work done by non-coders can run locally.

Regulation (2)

  • Tomas says major tech acquisitions face a narrow window before US, EU, or Chinese reviews can block them. He estimates an 18-month approval process and says companies pursuing large deals should aim to execute by June or July of the following year.
  • Jason argues that accredited-investor rules should let more people invest after taking a course, while DA Wallik says private companies stay private partly because the JOBS Act relaxed shareholder limits. Tomas says an IPO can cost far more than private financing, helping explain why public listings have declined.

Labor (1)

  • DA Wallik says anxiety over automation reflects a generational divide: older asset owners may benefit from autonomy and data centers while younger workers fear losing jobs and struggle with housing costs. He warns the Social Security trust fund is projected to become insolvent in 2032.

Autonomous Vehicles (1)

  • Elana Gold argues that autonomous vehicles can expand access to jobs for people without cars, while Jason says public acceptance will grow when people experience useful AI agents and services firsthand. Jason says his company spends $40,000 on AI tools and estimates they produce $2 million in value.

Politics (1)

  • Jason says AI could help people make better civic decisions by explaining complicated ballots and policy choices. DA Wallik argues that AI can make citizens better informed, but solving material problems such as housing, healthcare, and permitting still requires public policy and human action.

Robotics (1)

  • Jason and Elana Gold argue that everyday experiences such as robot vacuums, autonomous driving, and drone delivery can make technology’s benefits tangible. Jason points to Zipline deliveries and lower accident risk as ways consumers may come to value automation more than abstract promises.

Models (2)

  • Elana Gold says AI companies must prove that deployment costs work at scale, especially when products depend on outside models. The host cites Canva cutting 22% of its staff, arguing that AI can replace paid software work and force companies to reduce costs.
  • Tomas says frontier labs face rapid competition that limits how long they can earn exceptional margins, while continued investment requires healthy profits. He cites roughly 81% to 82% Anthropic gross margins and AWS operating margins of 35% to 36% as evidence that strong margins can coexist with competition.

VC (2)

  • Sequoia is consolidating its investment model by ending its London office, scout program, and Arc accelerator, combining early and growth investing, and simplifying its fund structure. Tomas says larger seed rounds make a single fund strategy more practical; Elana Gold says the change lets Sequoia back companies at multiple stages.
  • Elana Gold warns that uncapped SAFEs can leave investors without clear pricing or information rights, while DA Wallik describes secondary deal intermediaries as fee-taking brokers rather than committed investors. Wallik argues that late private listings keep ordinary savers from participating in company growth.

Startups (1)

  • Jason calls AI-native, capital-efficient startups “alicorns” because they can reach revenue without raising conventional venture rounds. Tomas sees an opening for small funds close to founders, while his firm backs about 10 companies per fund and deploys staff to build go-to-market functions.

Odyssey CEO Oliver Cameron is 90% sure we live in a simulation | E2358 • Nov 3

  • An ABC News/Washington Post Ipsos poll found broad opposition to U.S. data centers, especially among younger adults. OpenAI's Chris Lehane said the company was considering AI speed limits, global standards, and calling data centers “AI compute campuses” after the midterms.
  • Jason argues data-center developers need to show local residents specific benefits, not just run promotional campaigns. Meta's El Paso project lists 300 permanent jobs and 4,000 construction workers at peak; Jason suggests direct tax commitments or visible investments such as better-funded schools.
Also discussed on this episode: (13)

Agents (6)

  • Elon Musk said GrokBot’s serving costs were unsustainable relative to revenue after users reported exhausting weekly limits within days. Gwynne Shotwell said it had 800,000 paid weekly users, more than double the prior month; plans cost $30, $100, or $200 monthly.
  • Jason estimates Launch spends under $40,000 annually on AI tools and gets more than $2 million in value, including seven automated full-time jobs and tasks completed 100% faster. He says the software and content work would otherwise require roughly 12 to 14 employees.
  • Jason says agents became useful when services connected to Slack, Notion, email, and calendars, and virtual computers let them act inside a browser. He links bots together to use Substack analytics for writing recommendations, citing a 6% higher open rate for a successful title.
  • Jason had GrokBot research jacket styles, compare branding, create mockups, and publish a jacket site from about 15 minutes of spoken instructions. The work surfaced a cultural preference: Japanese customers may see Japanese writing on clothes as nerdy, while English lettering reads as cool.
  • Oliver says Odyssey can run 20 agents with distinct viewpoints in one world-model session and is working toward much larger-scale learning. He describes physics accuracy as a key goal, because it requires models to learn concepts such as gravity and fluid dynamics.
  • Jason says his bot reviewed unanswered X messages, replied to 500 people with startup-program links, and surfaced a missed message from a well-known basketball player. He argues LinkedIn should permit agent messaging with fees, daily limits, and recipient controls instead of blocking automation.

Models (2)

  • Oliver Cameron says Odyssey trains world models on visual observations so they learn physics, motion, cause and effect, then predict how the world may evolve. The models can generate environments for agents and help robots anticipate the consequences of actions.
  • Andrej Karpathy built HackerTube by having Claude Code mine years of Hacker News recommendations, creating a handpicked YouTube library without a click-chasing algorithm. Jason also built a local Amazon browser extension to hide sponsored listings, arguing that private interface changes differ from distributing a tool that undercuts the platform.

Autonomous Vehicles (2)

  • Oliver says repeated car-driving demonstrations taught autonomous systems too narrow a view of the world, leaving them brittle on edge cases. Odyssey sells its Odyssey 3 foundation model to physical-AI companies for post-training; it has revenue and raised $370 million.
  • Jason says he prefers Waymo whenever it is available because the quiet, driverless ride lets him avoid small talk and work alone. He argues Uber should let riders set preferences for conversation, music, temperature, cleanliness, and vehicle odors.

Philosophy (1)

  • Oliver says he is 90% certain reality is a simulation; a host puts the odds at 50-50. The simulated fruit fly used an open-source mapped brain connected to actions, a limited model rather than a biological fly operating in a faithful physical world.

Labor (1)

  • Jason says AI job losses could unite workers who lack equity in AI companies and graduates whose credentials no longer command good jobs. He argues political support depends on making housing affordable, expanding free trade-school access, and using technology to lower healthcare costs.

AI Infrastructure (1)

  • Google and Planet Labs tested four TPU chips on a prototype orbital data center launched by SpaceX; only one chip ran at a time, for about 20 minutes. Google plans more capable satellites in 2027 and targets economically viable orbital data centers in the 2030s.

The End of Trumpism • Nov 4

  • Elon Musk’s political spending failed to protect Republicans in Texas and may have backfired, Ezra Klein says; Musk spent $500 million, much of it in Texas. Democrats also campaigned against data centers, and nearly all proposed local moratoriums had passed as the episode was recorded.
Also discussed on this episode: (16)

Elections (13)

  • Ezra Klein says the midterm made the political map look wide open: Democrats won races in Kansas, Texas, Iowa and South Carolina, while the Mississippi Senate race remained undecided. The result upended assumptions about which states Democrats could contest.
  • Ezra Klein argues Trump lost support by ignoring voters’ priorities: he promised lower costs, fewer wars and border order, then raised costs with tariffs, entered new wars and sent masked ICE agents into settled communities. Trump never acknowledged the public’s anger or changed course.
  • Ezra Klein credits Democrats’ candidate recruitment and big-tent approach: Josh Turek, Adam Hamilton and James Talarico had local appeal, while candidates with varied backgrounds and identities won. The results undercut claims that women, Black candidates or other underrepresented groups lose because of their identity.
  • Democrats’ wins included the first openly gay male senator, the first Muslim senator, the first Black female governor, a senator with spina bifida and a Native American first. Ezra Klein says candidates’ records of appealing to the voters they need matter more than identity-based assumptions.
  • Ezra Klein says candidate fit mattered more than a simple moderate-versus-progressive label. James Talarico combined progressive healthcare and populist themes with more conservative positions on oil and gas and border security; the transcript cites Roy Cooper’s 20-point and John Ossoff’s 18-point wins.
  • Ezra Klein cautions Democrats against treating progressive candidates’ electoral performance as a verdict on their ideas or value. He calls Abdul El-Sayed impressive, but says his roughly seven-point win in a Democratic-leaning environment was not the strongest evidence for how to win new states.
  • Maine’s 2nd District illustrates the cost of driving out a useful coalition member, Ezra Klein argues: Jared Golden, the most conservative House Democrat, retired after pressure from the left, and Matt Dunlap’s race for the seat remained close even in a large Democratic wave.
  • Aaron Redica questions how much damage it took to turn voters against Trump; Ezra Klein answers that voters punish governments when life gets worse, regardless of a politician’s style. The transcript also notes that Trump benefited from a strong economy during much of his first term.
  • Aaron Redica calls the racial realignment theory premature: male voters swung 17 points toward Democrats, voters aged 18 to 29 swung 32 points and Hispanic voters swung 28 points. Ezra Klein warns that results cannot distinguish persuasion from turnout; midterm coalitions do not guarantee the next presidential result.
  • Ezra Klein says midterm waves have no fixed sequel: Democrats’ 2006 gains preceded Barack Obama’s 2008 win and a 60-seat Senate majority, but Republicans’ 1994 and 2010 waves were followed by Bill Clinton’s 1996 and Obama’s 2012 victories. Democrats also won after the 2018 midterms.
  • Ezra Klein describes John Ossoff as a disciplined, attention-savvy politician who has proved he can win in a competitive state. Democratic gains also extended to governorships; the transcript says Democrats now control states totaling 392 electoral votes.
  • Ezra Klein says Democrats should balance investigations of Trump with practical legislation and agenda-building. Possible priorities include permitting reform, AI rules, immigration policy, healthcare, Medicare-for-more proposals and childcare; the party also needs to define a governing program for 2028.
  • Ezra Klein argues that Trumpism never formed a coherent ideology because Trump prioritizes personal control and loyalty over policy consistency. He says factions will blame one another after the losses, while J.D. Vance may present himself as a version of Trumpism without the war despite weak electoral results and low popularity.

AI Infrastructure (1)

  • Ezra Klein sees major risks ahead: an AI capital-spending boom could collapse, the Iran war could widen, and conflicts involving Israel, Russia and Ukraine, or China and Taiwan could escalate. He also flags Trump’s health and the possibility of AI systems hacking into China.

Corruption (1)

  • Ezra Klein says congressional investigations should focus on a few legible threads, especially money flowing to Trump, his family and associates. He names the Qatari jet, Jared Kushner’s fund, crypto, contracts and the Trump family’s profits, alongside the dismantling of agencies including USAID and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Religion (1)

  • Ezra Klein and Aaron Redica see an opening for a religious left that speaks explicitly about virtue and neighborly obligation. They praise James Talarico, Adam Hamilton, Abdul El-Sayed and John Ossoff, while criticizing cruelty in the campaigns of Ken Paxton and Vivek Ramaswamy and Roger Marshall’s treatment of patients.

11/4/26: Trump and MAGA Self Implode After Major Losses, Data Centers Crushed At Ballot Box • Nov 4

  • Data-center ballot measures lost 41 to 0, with opposition around 67% to 80% in every cited case. The hosts linked resistance to noise, pollution, energy bills, local control, and corruption, and said candidates opposing data centers also won races.
  • The hosts outlined possible AI policy paths: guardrails, limits on recursive self-improvement, a full moratorium, or a broader pause. They said states could restrict data centers and AI even if Trump vetoed federal limits, while suggesting less model spending might make AI firms profitable sooner.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)

Elections (8)

  • Trump accepted the election results and said he wanted to work with Democrats, despite promoting a veto hat. The hosts noted there were election monitors but no ICE or National Guard deployment at polling places.
  • Trump called his first two years the greatest in presidential history, citing a closed southern border and zero crossings for 17 months. He blamed gasoline prices, not the Iran war, for voter discontent and called its costs short-term.
  • Mark Levin argued that the losses reflected weak candidates, confusing messaging, affordability, health care, housing, energy, and the Iran conflict, then blamed the “woke right.” The hosts said Levin was smearing a broad range of people who opposed the war.
  • Laura Loomer declared America effectively over, claiming Democrats would open the border, replace votes with those of undocumented immigrants, and impose communism and Sharia law. The hosts treated her post as an example of blaming critics for demoralizing the country.
  • Caroline Sunshine argued that Trump’s 2024 message had been co-opted by Democrats, who campaigned on corruption, the economy, and sending less money to foreign wars. The hosts said Republicans’ attacks on Hassan Piker distracted from voters’ concerns about prices and the war.
  • Republicans faced leadership contests after the losses: Steve Scalise was expected to challenge Jim Jordan, with Jordan’s small-dollar fundraising contrasted against Scalise’s lobbying ties. The hosts also reported that Mike Johnson would not run for minority leader.
  • The hosts said Democrats should consider replacing Chuck Schumer as Senate leader, arguing that new members could unite across ideological lines against him. They pointed to candidates who had opposed his leadership and said voters expected a break from the party’s past.
  • The hosts described anti-billionaire sentiment as a national political force and said tech wealth could not be rehabilitated with symbolic gestures. They cautioned that campaign money still matters, citing Will Lawrence’s costly race, but said spending has diminishing returns when voters reject a candidate’s message.

Media (1)

  • The hosts said Trump closely follows Fox News, complains about its polls and commentators, and would not commit to cabinet changes. They warned that blaming tariffs instead of the Iran war could keep Trump from hearing voters' opposition to the war.

Trade (1)

  • A Wall Street Journal editorial blamed Trump’s universal tariffs for hurting farm states and trade with Canada, while omitting Iran from its election analysis. The hosts said affordability and economic discontent helped drive the losses.

War (1)

  • The hosts briefly cited reports of children tortured in dungeons in Ukraine, attributed to the Azov Battalion, alongside riots. They said major international crises were unfolding while domestic election coverage absorbed attention.

Iran (2)

  • Democrats could use the approaching funding deadline to force a vote on the Iran war, Chris Van Hollen argued, including by withholding support for the National Defense Authorization Act if it enabled continued operations. The hosts said Chuck Schumer would face pressure to lead that fight.
  • Chris Murphy called the administration’s Iran war plan insane, warning it could prolong and escalate the conflict, target civilian infrastructure, and damage US security and the rule of law. The hosts criticized Democrats for discussing a continuing resolution that would fund the war.

Models (1)

  • Abdul El-Sayed endorsed a full pause on frontier AI development, arguing that China’s work largely builds on US models and that both countries have an interest in avoiding uncontrolled recursive self-improvement. He also called for an international treaty and cooperation with China.