Price:

Data center votes put AI’s buildout on local terms

Nov 8, 2026Summary from 9 podcasts.
  • Nearly every data-center measure cited by the shows passed, as voters objected to local costs and loss of control.
  • Candidates opposing expansion won key races, putting new pressure on developers to win community approval.
  • The likely fight is over whether projects can proceed, and on what terms.

Nearly every local ballot measure on data centers cited by the shows passed. More than a dozen Ohio towns voted to halt or restrict development, and similar restrictions passed in Kansas, Florida and California. Candidates campaigning against expansion also won key races, including Gina Hinojosa in Texas and Sherrod Brown in Ohio.

The anger was less about AI in the abstract than what a data center could mean next door: noise, water use, pressure on electricity supplies and higher household bills. Nathaniel Whittemore, host of The AI Daily Brief, pointed to polling showing that 61% of voters disliked candidates who supported building data centers locally. Opposition crossed party lines, though it was stronger among Democrats. AI itself ranked lower as a voter priority.

That distinction helps explain why data centers became a campaign issue even when they were not voters’ top concern. In Texas, Hinojosa campaigned for a construction pause and new rules; in Ohio, Brown attacked his opponent’s support for development. The Ezra Klein Show’s Michelle Goldberg described Texas campaigns connecting residents’ complaints about noise, property values and construction to a broader argument about tech billionaires making decisions that affect local communities.

What happens next is less settled than the election results. Whittemore and Jason Calacanis of This Week in Startups expect many officials to seek conditions, such as companies paying for electricity and water infrastructure, rather than stop construction altogether. But All-In’s David Sacks warned that new projects could stall while states rewrite their rules, even if permitted projects continue. A Goldman Sachs estimate cited on Moonshots with Peter Diamandis put 45% of planned U.S. data-center construction at risk of restrictions.

A slowdown could also change who has access to computing capacity. All-In’s Chamath Palihapitiya argued that companies with infrastructure already in place could benefit, while AI firms that rent computing power face tighter supply and higher costs. The immediate message from voters is simpler: developers can no longer assume a site, power supply and permit will be enough. They have to persuade the people who live nearby.

Source Intelligence

- Deep dive into what was said in the episodes

Midterm Blood Bath, $4T AI Sell Off, Data Center Freeze, What's Next for Trump • Nov 7

  • Data centers became a proxy for economic frustration: residents see rising utility bills and water use while major technology companies receive tax breaks. Chamath Palihapitiya said local officials would demand measurable community benefits; the SpaceX team faced loud opposition while presenting a proposed Arizona project.
  • Chamath Palihapitiya said slower data-center construction would favor hyperscalers with existing capacity and squeeze cloud renters and frontier-model companies. He highlighted SpaceX's 90-day termination option in its compute deal with Anthropic as leverage to reprice scarce capacity or redirect it to larger customers.
Also discussed on this episode: (12)

Elections (5)

  • Democrats swept both chambers and won at least 29 governor races, while Republicans lost ground across voter groups and several deeply red states, including Texas, Kansas, Iowa, and South Carolina. The Senate and House counts were still unsettled.
  • David Sacks blamed the Republican defeat on the Iran war and its effect on household costs: fuel and transport pushed inflation higher, erased the prospect of rate cuts, and made affordability the dominant voter concern. He argued that ending the war could reverse those pressures.
  • Chamath Palihapitiya read the result as a rejection of an economy that rewards asset owners while wage earners struggle, rather than a clear ideological turn. He cited failed spending and redistricting strategies, and Gallup's finding that Americans were far less optimistic about AI than Chinese respondents.
  • Jason Calacanis said Trump's approval fell before the Iran war amid tariffs, ICE enforcement, and the Epstein-files dispute; David Sacks countered that the Senate forecast barely moved after the tariff rollout and shifted sharply after the war began. Their disagreement centered on whether the war or the broader record drove the collapse.
  • David Sacks argued that presidents can recover from midterm losses by changing course, citing Bill Clinton and Barack Obama; he warned that doubling down on the Iran war could repeat George W. Bush's political trajectory after Iraq. Chamath Palihapitiya said Trump should preserve border controls and seek economic concessions.

Macro (1)

  • David Friedberg argued that the end of DOGE and continued federal spending left the cost-of-living problem untouched. He linked the post-COVID rise in spending to higher prices and argued that the 2025 budget did not materially change the government's spending trajectory.

Regulation (2)

  • Jason Calacanis proposed a deal-focused response: tax large capital-gains-backed loans, raise the minimum wage, bar lawmakers from stock trading and foreign business, and encourage homebuilding. Chamath Palihapitiya favored eliminating federal income taxes below roughly $125,000 to $150,000.
  • David Friedberg warned that states may restrict AI development, deployment, and use, while David Sacks predicted federal rules requiring frontier models to undergo government review. Both raised concerns about state power over AI, though Chamath Palihapitiya argued that broad regulation could instead entrench large technology companies.

Markets (1)

  • A roughly $4 trillion market-cap decline hit AI and technology stocks, including Nvidia, SpaceX, Tesla, AMD, and Micron. The selloff also lowered prediction-market odds for OpenAI going public, while reports suggested its potential valuation could be nearer $1 trillion than earlier estimates.

AI Infrastructure (1)

  • David Sacks expected fully permitted data-center projects to continue through 2027 but warned that permitting uncertainty could sharply reduce the 2028 pipeline. He said gigawatt-scale facilities require certainty before construction because a halted project can strand enormous investment.

Agents (1)

  • Jason Calacanis said his firm was spending about $50,000 a year on AI subscriptions and estimated roughly $2 million in value, with agents increasing investment and media-production capacity. He predicted more local-model use and offshore data-center construction if U.S. permitting slows.

Reasoning (1)

  • David Friedberg said OpenAI's 175-page paper challenged the Exponential Time Hypothesis by presenting a subexponential solution for a class of 3-SAT problems. He stressed that outside verification was still underway, while arguing that the result keeps open the possibility that P equals NP.

The Great Collision Between Politics and AI | #309 • Nov 7

  • The host says the midterms put AI infrastructure into election debates at an unusual scale. Goldman Sachs estimates restrictions could reach 45% of planned US data-center construction, while candidates backing pauses won or led in 12 gubernatorial races.
Also discussed on this episode: (17)

Markets (2)

  • The host expects Anthropic to proceed with its IPO: Polymarket odds looked clear when the roadshow began, though public reports say bankers are pressing for a lower valuation. A speaker compares the pressure to Meta’s IPO, which priced down sharply before its shares later rose many times over.
  • The host says markets priced in slower power generation and delayed data-center approvals, while approved construction is less likely to stop because of sunk costs and jobs. The selloff also reflected fears that China could gain ground as US infrastructure slows.

AI Infrastructure (3)

  • The host argues that data-center resistance is largely a state and local issue, not a uniform rejection of AI. Alex says communities should bargain for concrete benefits such as school lunches, medical coverage, or tax relief rather than ban projects outright.
  • The host says political uncertainty could shift data-center investment toward states that welcome it, including Tennessee and Virginia, and toward Canada’s abundant power. Alex expects orbital compute to gain momentum as terrestrial projects face election-driven permitting risk.
  • The host says major buyers have reserved much of the country’s compute and chip capacity, leaving smaller firms unable to obtain cloud access. Speakers warn that compute access could become a basic requirement for business, while Alex says scarcity should raise prices and create incentives to build elsewhere.

Models (4)

  • Alex says frontier labs need consumer-facing benefits that make AI tangible, proposing that they use superintelligence to tackle the top 5,000 diseases. The host adds that a personal health tool or widely loved AI product could build public support faster than abstract benchmark gains.
  • Alex expects frontier-model improvement to move from scheduled releases toward continuous updates around early 2027. He predicts AI systems will explain new architectures, while the host argues rapid releases will force companies to rethink how people absorb new capabilities.
  • The speakers expect recursive self-improvement to redirect compute toward science, engineering, medicine, and products such as drugs. The host predicts many people’s first vivid AI encounter could be a cheap, personalized talking avatar; Alex also predicts AI could enable relativistic probes and force renewed attention to the Fermi paradox.
  • A paper measuring AI economic value per joule tested professional tasks across occupations: GLM 5.2 led in average task value, while Gemma 4’s 31-billion-parameter version delivered more value per joule. Alex favors measuring economic output against economic input, since watts may not remain the right denominator.

Labor (1)

  • Alex frames AI’s social bargain as a trade between capital and labor: superintelligence could bring disease treatment, universal basic benefits, and broader human uplift. He warns municipalities that banning data centers may forfeit leverage before compute shifts to space.

Energy (1)

  • The host says power constraints were already pushing developers toward efficiency, and political backlash adds urgency. The host also urges European energy executives to build generation, arguing that Europe’s focus on gas supply and local politics obscures rising AI power demand.

Reasoning (2)

  • An independent METR study found Anthropic’s AI development accelerating at roughly 1.9 times its historical rate, with researchers attributing about 80% of the acceleration to AI-assisted research. Alex says METR’s charts and internal compute allocation indicate recursive self-improvement is already well underway.
  • Alex defines recursive self-improvement partly by whether new compute is assigned to AI researchers rather than human researchers; he says the balance may already have crossed 50%. The speakers cite AI-generated research ideas, large agent runs, and scientific problem-solving as evidence that AI can improve its own research process.

Regulation (1)

  • The White House’s NSTM-6 policy requires federally funded researchers to use approved DNA and RNA synthesis providers, with customer verification and record retention. Alex favors controls on physical synthesis over government rules on what people or AI systems may think.

Robotics (1)

  • Alex expects similar physical-world rules for general-purpose robots, potentially requiring approved manufacturers and logs of commands. He argues that regulation should focus on actions and safety controls, rather than restricting access to compute or AI research.

Space (1)

  • A New Zealand photographer combined long exposures to show thousands of satellite trails, which Alex calls evidence of an emerging “baby Dyson swarm.” He says orbital compute could reduce reliance on politically exposed terrestrial data centers, with sun-synchronous orbit offering room before expansion elsewhere in the solar system.

Politics (1)

  • Alex sees political swings as cyclical and superintelligence as a continuing secular trend; he cites Ray Kurzweil’s law of accelerating returns to argue that wars and depressions have had little effect on compute’s long-term price. The host warns that institutions must adapt actively rather than let technological change unfold unchecked.

How the Democrats Did It • Nov 7

  • Texas residents blamed data centers for noise, livestock disruption, falling property values, water risks, and construction in rural areas. Michelle Goldberg says Talarico and Gina Hinojosa turned that local anger into populist opposition to tech billionaires and an AI buildout residents felt they could not control.
Also discussed on this episode: (15)

Elections (9)

  • Michelle Goldberg credits Texas Democrats’ gains to a full slate of serious candidates, whose events, ads, and turnout efforts reinforced one another instead of relying on a single marquee campaign. Democrats won four of five redistricted House seats and made major gains in the Texas House.
  • Michelle Goldberg says James Talarico paired a religious appeal to love and neighborliness with populist attacks on billionaires and corporate power. His campaign offered a different political tone without asking Democrats to stop fighting over economic inequality.
  • Michelle Goldberg says Ossoff drew on Georgia’s civil-rights tradition and built support among Black voters and suburban women who had become politically active after 2016. His attacks on Mike Collins tied election denial and racial provocation to constituent costs and corruption.
  • Jon Ossoff’s reserved, carefully written speeches stood out against politicians copying Donald Trump’s loose, constant-media style. Michelle Goldberg says Ossoff believes restraint can make voters more attentive when he speaks, and noted that he writes his own speeches.
  • Michelle Goldberg says Democratic gains in the South made Republican seats newly contestable, raising the stakes for candidate recruitment and sustained party investment. She cited Scott Colom’s Mississippi race after his blocked federal judicial appointment, and questioned how Republicans can hold a coalition together across a changing electorate.
  • Michelle Goldberg criticizes Democratic leaders for favoring Haley Stevens’s establishment backing over the visibility and energy of Abdul El-Sayed and Mallory McMorrow. Goldberg also saw a sharp drop in enthusiasm between Graham Platner’s campaign and Troy Jackson’s later Maine events.
  • Abdul El-Sayed ran as a working-class populist, arguing that attacks on his name and Muslim faith distracted from the cost of gas, groceries, and medical care. Michelle Goldberg says his win showed that a candidate can face heavy identity-based attacks and still succeed with a focused economic message.
  • Adam Hamilton combined a pastor’s appeal to shared values with populist criticism of Roger Marshall’s treatment of patients’ medical debt. Hamilton described himself as both liberal and conservative and called himself pro-life with a heavy heart, a culturally moderate style Goldberg compared with older Democratic campaigns.
  • Michelle Goldberg says Democrats are reconsidering which voters they can win: some MAGA voters may respond to candidates who address economic hardship with respect and practical help, not only to appeals aimed at educated suburbanites. She contrasts that approach with the resistance strategy that followed Trump’s 2016 victory.

Education (1)

  • Michelle Goldberg found anger among conservative Texas voters over Greg Abbott’s school vouchers, which residents said were draining public schools. One former superintendent who had voted Democratic only once since the 1990s joined Gina Hinojosa’s campaign over the issue.

Immigration (1)

  • Michelle Goldberg says immigration enforcement drove a sharp Democratic swing in heavily Hispanic Texas border counties, after residents saw relatives and neighbors detained and heard accounts of citizens being roughed up by ICE. Bobby Pulido won a Trump district by 25 points.

Corruption (2)

  • Jon Ossoff connected Donald Trump’s corruption to household costs, arguing that public money and policy were benefiting Trump-aligned donors while constituents paid more for health care, gas, and groceries. Michelle Goldberg says Ossoff made complex allegations, including a Kazakhstan tungsten deal, into clear political stories.
  • Michelle Goldberg sees the emerging Democratic coalition as focused on oligarchy, corporate power, and corruption, with investigations into the diversion of public goods as common ground between accountability and governing. She warns that holding a broad coalition together in office will be harder than winning with one.

Health (1)

  • Michelle Goldberg says Medicare for All, once treated as an electoral liability, drew little effective attack in Michigan as health-care costs shaped voters’ concerns. She expects health reform to return to Democratic debate and noted that several doctors are entering the Senate caucus.

History (1)

  • Michelle Goldberg recommended three novels: Patmina Sabbat’s Good People, about an Afghan American family and assimilation; Mario Vargas Llosa’s The Feast of the Goat, about Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo; and Leonardo Padura’s The Man Who Loved Dogs, about Leon Trotsky’s assassination.

The End of Trumpism • Nov 4

  • Elon Musk’s political spending failed to protect Republicans in Texas and may have backfired, Ezra Klein says; Musk spent $500 million, much of it in Texas. Democrats also campaigned against data centers, and nearly all proposed local moratoriums had passed as the episode was recorded.
Also discussed on this episode: (16)

Elections (13)

  • Ezra Klein says the midterm made the political map look wide open: Democrats won races in Kansas, Texas, Iowa and South Carolina, while the Mississippi Senate race remained undecided. The result upended assumptions about which states Democrats could contest.
  • Ezra Klein argues Trump lost support by ignoring voters’ priorities: he promised lower costs, fewer wars and border order, then raised costs with tariffs, entered new wars and sent masked ICE agents into settled communities. Trump never acknowledged the public’s anger or changed course.
  • Ezra Klein credits Democrats’ candidate recruitment and big-tent approach: Josh Turek, Adam Hamilton and James Talarico had local appeal, while candidates with varied backgrounds and identities won. The results undercut claims that women, Black candidates or other underrepresented groups lose because of their identity.
  • Democrats’ wins included the first openly gay male senator, the first Muslim senator, the first Black female governor, a senator with spina bifida and a Native American first. Ezra Klein says candidates’ records of appealing to the voters they need matter more than identity-based assumptions.
  • Ezra Klein says candidate fit mattered more than a simple moderate-versus-progressive label. James Talarico combined progressive healthcare and populist themes with more conservative positions on oil and gas and border security; the transcript cites Roy Cooper’s 20-point and John Ossoff’s 18-point wins.
  • Ezra Klein cautions Democrats against treating progressive candidates’ electoral performance as a verdict on their ideas or value. He calls Abdul El-Sayed impressive, but says his roughly seven-point win in a Democratic-leaning environment was not the strongest evidence for how to win new states.
  • Maine’s 2nd District illustrates the cost of driving out a useful coalition member, Ezra Klein argues: Jared Golden, the most conservative House Democrat, retired after pressure from the left, and Matt Dunlap’s race for the seat remained close even in a large Democratic wave.
  • Aaron Redica questions how much damage it took to turn voters against Trump; Ezra Klein answers that voters punish governments when life gets worse, regardless of a politician’s style. The transcript also notes that Trump benefited from a strong economy during much of his first term.
  • Aaron Redica calls the racial realignment theory premature: male voters swung 17 points toward Democrats, voters aged 18 to 29 swung 32 points and Hispanic voters swung 28 points. Ezra Klein warns that results cannot distinguish persuasion from turnout; midterm coalitions do not guarantee the next presidential result.
  • Ezra Klein says midterm waves have no fixed sequel: Democrats’ 2006 gains preceded Barack Obama’s 2008 win and a 60-seat Senate majority, but Republicans’ 1994 and 2010 waves were followed by Bill Clinton’s 1996 and Obama’s 2012 victories. Democrats also won after the 2018 midterms.
  • Ezra Klein describes John Ossoff as a disciplined, attention-savvy politician who has proved he can win in a competitive state. Democratic gains also extended to governorships; the transcript says Democrats now control states totaling 392 electoral votes.
  • Ezra Klein says Democrats should balance investigations of Trump with practical legislation and agenda-building. Possible priorities include permitting reform, AI rules, immigration policy, healthcare, Medicare-for-more proposals and childcare; the party also needs to define a governing program for 2028.
  • Ezra Klein argues that Trumpism never formed a coherent ideology because Trump prioritizes personal control and loyalty over policy consistency. He says factions will blame one another after the losses, while J.D. Vance may present himself as a version of Trumpism without the war despite weak electoral results and low popularity.

AI Infrastructure (1)

  • Ezra Klein sees major risks ahead: an AI capital-spending boom could collapse, the Iran war could widen, and conflicts involving Israel, Russia and Ukraine, or China and Taiwan could escalate. He also flags Trump’s health and the possibility of AI systems hacking into China.

Corruption (1)

  • Ezra Klein says congressional investigations should focus on a few legible threads, especially money flowing to Trump, his family and associates. He names the Qatari jet, Jared Kushner’s fund, crypto, contracts and the Trump family’s profits, alongside the dismantling of agencies including USAID and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Religion (1)

  • Ezra Klein and Aaron Redica see an opening for a religious left that speaks explicitly about virtue and neighborly obligation. They praise James Talarico, Adam Hamilton, Abdul El-Sayed and John Ossoff, while criticizing cruelty in the campaigns of Ken Paxton and Vivek Ramaswamy and Roger Marshall’s treatment of patients.

It Could Happen Here Weekly 257 • Nov 7

  • The panel says most local ballot measures concerning data centers failed, indicating strong opposition even in Ohio, a state described as especially business-friendly.
Also discussed on this episode: (56)

Elections (37)

  • Caio Almendra describes Brazil’s first-round results as a crisis for the left: Bolsonarismo expanded its congressional bench, and Flávio Bolsonaro’s platform threatened deep cuts, political reprisals, and harsher criminal penalties.
  • Caio Almendra says Lula’s campaign moved to ban online sports betting just before the first round, a popular proposal aimed at a country where gambling addiction affects millions.
  • Caio Almendra argues that fear alone could not revive the campaign; student marches, viral creator content, and visible street organizing helped turn despair into shared hope and participation.
  • Caio Almendra says Flávio Bolsonaro’s public image was vulnerable to alleged links among banker Daniel Vorcaro, a betting platform, a megachurch, and political donors, while mainstream coverage largely ignored the story.
  • Caio Almendra says Flávio Bolsonaro’s circle proposed ending Bolsa Família, freezing wages, and resisting shorter workweeks, while an allied pastor’s anti-Catholic attacks risked alienating Brazil’s Catholic majority.
  • Caio Almendra presents André Janones as an unconventional online campaign organizer whose WhatsApp channel gave Lula supporters daily marching orders and grew far beyond its original target.
  • Caio Almendra says Janones’s network countered far-right message repetition by circulating the same content widely, blocking hostile accounts, and using curiosity-driven teasers to disrupt online narratives.
  • Caio Almendra credits Janones with channeling popular mobilization, but notes that Erika Hilton built a comparable organizing network; the campaign’s scale came from collective energy, not one strategist alone.
  • Danielle Lee Thompson says election researchers use “rumor” for uncertain claims whose truth and intent are not yet established; misinformation is false or misleading without proven intent, while disinformation is deliberately deceptive.
  • Stephen Prohaska says rigged-election rumors often mislead by distorting evidence, exaggerating the effect of real problems, ignoring remedies, or assigning malicious intent to routine errors.
  • Danielle Lee Thompson says election administration varies by jurisdiction, so unfamiliar procedures can look suspicious when they are routine; backup paper ballots and other safeguards can resolve many reported problems.
  • Danielle Lee Thompson says a president’s control of federal agencies and the rise of prediction markets have changed the rumor environment, while anxiety about federal interference has also increased rumor-sharing among left-leaning communities.
  • Danielle Lee Thompson says Trump offered a $1 million reward for reports of election fraud through fraud.gov, turning a public fraud-reporting portal into a high-profile invitation to search for evidence.
  • Stephen Prohaska says non-citizen voting claims are amplified through public arrests and ambiguous evidence despite being statistically rare; the Brennan Center study he cited found a negligible share of voters were non-citizens.
  • Stephen Prohaska describes election contestation as a three-stage process: convince audiences fraud is happening, collect purported evidence, then use that evidence in lawsuits and political messaging.
  • Garrison Davis reports a sweeping Democratic victory in the U.S. midterms, with Democrats projected to gain a large House majority and substantially expand their Senate advantage.
  • Garrison Davis highlights Democratic Senate wins in Michigan, Maine, North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, Iowa, and Kansas, including victories in states Trump had carried comfortably in 2024.
  • Garrison Davis says several Democratic candidates campaigned against attacks on trans people, while others adopted restrictive positions; the issue appeared across swing-state campaigns and ballot measures.
  • Stephen Monticelli says Texas Democrats made gains across statewide and rural races, while the results exposed political damage from Republican policies and candidates rather than a few isolated wins.
  • Stephen Monticelli says Texas Republicans’ hard-right primary politics did not translate into general-election support; Paxton’s corruption record, cost-of-living pressures, school vouchers, and anti-trans attacks all fed voter backlash.
  • Robert Evans says Dan Patrick helped build Texas Republicans’ legislative infrastructure and pushed restrictive abortion and school policies; Monticelli notes that opposition to hemp-derived cannabis rules also angered voters.
  • The panel reports Democratic gains in governorships and state legislatures, including five new state trifectas and advances in several chambers where Democrats still fell short of unified control.
  • Kevin Foster says Washington voters rejected repeal of the state’s millionaire tax but approved a measure requiring sex-at-birth documentation for school sports; the ACLU planned a legal challenge.
  • Garrison Davis says anti-trans ballot measures also passed in Arizona and Colorado, while Missouri voters rejected a bundled amendment that would have restricted abortion and gender-affirming care for minors.
  • Robert Evans says a Silicon Valley-backed effort to elect Pete Ricketts succeeded in Nebraska, while independent Dan Osborn’s labor-focused campaign ultimately lost.
  • James Stout says California voters appeared to reject a one-time billionaire wealth tax, while a separate measure extending higher income taxes on top earners looked likely to pass.
  • The panel says the election brought a sharp shift among younger voters, including young men, and that many young voters identified with democratic socialism.
  • Garrison Davis says Republican redistricting failed to deliver seats and instead angered voters, increased Black turnout, and spread Republican voters across districts that Democrats then won.
  • The panel reports strong Indigenous candidate results and turnout, including Deb Haaland’s New Mexico gubernatorial win and Peggy Flanagan’s Minnesota victory.
  • Kevin Foster says Portland’s DSA-backed city council candidates held their seats, while San Diego organizers began the process to recall Mayor Todd Gloria over homelessness, policing, and alleged real-estate conflicts.
  • Robert Evans argues that a new Democratic majority should investigate Trump administration officials and pursue consequences for DOGE, the Justice Department, and ICE, even if Congress faces limits while Trump remains president.
  • James Stout says the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s request to segregate California ballots, denying a last effort to preserve a challenge to votes. He argues that the government’s efforts to intimidate voters failed to affect the election.
  • Garrison Davis says Mary Peltola led Alaska’s Senate race by 600 votes with 25% still uncounted, while Scott Colom led Mississippi’s race by fewer than 2,000 votes with more than 40,000 ballots outstanding. Mia Wong notes that Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith had blocked Colom’s judicial nomination.
  • Garrison Davis says DSA’s federal bloc has grown to eight members, including Rashida Tlaib, AOC, Donovan McKinney, Chris Rabb, Milat Kiros, Angela Gonzalez-Torres, Daria Elisa Villachavier, and Claire Valdez. At least 93 DSA candidates also won federal, state, or municipal office.
  • Garrison Davis says DSA-endorsed Nithya Raman won Los Angeles’s mayoral race by three points. The DSA national committee voted 14-13 against forcing the local chapter to withdraw its endorsement amid disputes over Raman’s support for BDS.
  • Garrison Davis says Justin Pearson lost Tennessee’s House race by fewer than 3,000 votes, while William Lawrence won Michigan’s 7th District despite more than $20 million in Republican spending. Mia Wong highlights Alison Montgomery’s 22-point swing to win an Alabama district Trump had carried by 16 points.
  • Mia Wong says Republicans mistook 2024 anti-incumbent votes for lasting loyalty to Trump, while J.D. Vance blamed losses on war, living costs, inflation, America First, and Israel policy. Republicans also faulted Trump’s friendly meeting with Mamdani, and Trump promised on Election Day to end $4 billion in Israel aid by year’s end.

Iran (8)

  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg says Iranian Kurdish opposition parties have operated from Iraqi Kurdistan since their defeat after the 1979 revolution, leaving them exposed to Iranian strikes and pressure to leave Iraq.
  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg says PJAK has clashed with Iran near its Iraqi Kurdistan bases and has drone experience through links with the PKK and SDF; the Turkey-PKK peace process leaves PJAK’s future unsettled.
  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg says Kurdish unrest in Iran predates the current conflict, including the Jina Amini protests; Kurdish participation has varied, and Iranian crackdowns have repeatedly followed protest waves.
  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg says Iranian opposition groups remain fragmented, with no broad alliance comparable to the Iraqi opposition before Saddam Hussein’s removal; exile and neighboring states’ resistance make coordination harder.
  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg says Iraqi Kurdish leaders and Turkey opposed Iranian Kurdish incursions into Iran, fearing retaliation or a new Kurdish autonomous region; Kurdish parties in Iraq sent forces to the border to prevent an attack.
  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg argues that airstrikes alone are unlikely to topple Iran’s government, and that insurgency would need local territorial control or a major uprising to force meaningful concessions.
  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg says Iran wants Iranian Kurdish groups removed from Iraqi Kurdistan, but any relocation or peace deal would need to address multiple factions and Kurdish opposition to forced surrender.
  • James Stout says the United States called a strike on Iranian air defenses defensive, while Donald Trump said the defenses were rebuilt and then destroyed. Iran later claimed its 358 loitering munition downed an MQ-9 Reaper over the Strait of Hormuz.

Media (1)

  • Vladimir Van Wilgenberg says inaccurate U.S. reporting that Iraqi Kurds were preparing to invade Iran made the region a more likely target; Kurdish leaders later said forces had gone to the border to seal it.

VC (1)

  • Robert Evans says AI and crypto interests spent heavily on the midterms but lost many of their targeted races, including a major effort to defeat Sherrod Brown in Ohio.

Regulation (1)

  • Garrison Davis reports that Zohran Mamdani canceled New York City’s planned $225 million public safety academy in Queens. A state appeals court also cleared his tax on second homes worth millions of dollars to proceed.

Labor (3)

  • Garrison Davis reports that dockworkers struck across 22 countries and more than 100 ports to protest arms shipments. James Stout says European dockworkers have organized similar actions for years, especially in Italy, Greece, and France.
  • Mia Wong says nearly one million Bangladeshi garment workers went on strike or could not work, closing 500 of 2,500 factories. Workers sought a monthly minimum wage increase from $100 to $250; the sector employs four million people, many working 50-to-60-hour weeks.
  • Mia Wong reports that a French general strike coincided with student protests, with estimates of 600,000 people in the streets and unions claiming 1.3 million. She says Macron sought to require protests to be backed by unions or NGOs, a measure that could channel unrest into negotiable, less disruptive forms.

War (1)

  • James Stout reports that four Russian drone operators are deployed long-term with Myanmar’s armed forces in southern Shan State. He says the Tatmadaw has improved its drone use with Russian and Chinese technology, and calls for more international solidarity with Myanmar’s resistance.

Health (2)

  • Bernie Sanders renewed his push for Medicare for All, Peggy Flanagan vowed to dismantle ICE, Robert Garcia promised investigations, and Ron Wyden signaled subpoenas. Robert Evans argues Democrats should pursue accountability alongside affordability measures and worker power, including the PRO Act.
  • Ahmed El-Sayed argues that oversight should connect policy failures to immediate costs for households. He cited a Michigan cyclospora outbreak, saying 8,000 illnesses were reported and the CDC’s count lagged the state health department’s by 2,000 cases after DOGE cuts weakened the FDA.

Corruption (1)

  • Mia Wong describes a House Judiciary Committee report alleging that Donald Trump abused, assaulted, or raped women in connection with Jeffrey Epstein and that the administration obstructed scrutiny of the Epstein files. The report cites accounts from 11 women and calls for an independent counsel.

Banking (1)

  • Mia Wong reports that Paraguay’s central bank seized Unil Bank after finding it far below reserve requirements, with loans to bank owners’ associates and misleading accounts. The failure blocked access to money for a bank used by 60% of the population, triggering protests and President Santiago Peña’s resignation.

11/6/26: M4A! NO Israel Aid! Trump District Dems SHOCK Establishment, Schumer, Jeffries ON THE ROPES w/ David Sirota, Jeffries SOFT On Trump Investigations, Stocks Plummet, PANIC After Blue Nuke • Nov 6

  • Technology stocks and Bitcoin fell after the election as investors priced in Democratic oversight and local resistance to data centers; the hosts said AI firms were already trying to rebrand with promises on schools, jobs, labor, and environmental impacts. Jason Calacanis proposed taxing data centers to fund universal healthcare.
Also discussed on this episode: (16)

Media (2)

  • The hosts challenged Free Press reporter Olivia Rheingold’s designer-fashion post after she corrected the event attribution and said ChatGPT had sharpened her photo; they also criticized her famine reporting for relying on online searches, contacting no families, and claiming 12 cases when the hosts counted 10, or possibly 11.
  • David Sirota said independent media can expose gaps between politicians’ promises and their actions, making post-election scrutiny essential. He described The Lever as built to pressure Democrats to deliver on economic-populist, anti-war, and anti-genocide promises rather than return to business as usual.

Elections (7)

  • The hosts argued that economic populism and affordability united otherwise ideologically different Democratic candidates, with Zohran Mamdani’s campaign framing echoed by candidates nationwide. They said winning now depends on delivering material improvements, including housing, childcare, transit, and healthcare.
  • Election results showed large swings in places treated as safely red or blue: Bobby Pulido won a Trump-plus-16 district by about 20 points, while James Tallarico’s early votes alone exceeded Ken Paxton’s total vote count. The hosts argued that party coalitions and state identities can change quickly.
  • Democrats made sweeping gains in state governments, including six new trifectas and 11 legislative chambers changing from Republican to Democratic control. The hosts said those victories could shape redistricting, law enforcement, abortion policy, and school standards for years.
  • New Democratic members from conservative districts voiced support for Medicare for All, conditional foreign aid, and a tougher stance toward Israel, while several withheld support for Hakeem Jeffries until they heard his commitments. Chuck Hubbard described himself as center-left and backed universal healthcare; Victoria Broderick called her campaign the district’s most progressive.
  • David Sirota contrasted the new populist candidates with the 2006 Democratic wave, when Rahm Emanuel recruited economically conservative candidates who later helped produce an incoherent party agenda. Sirota argued that anti-oligarch politics now reads as mainstream because voters want economic change.
  • Chuck Schumer’s and Hakeem Jeffries’s leadership positions faced pressure after the election, with David Sirota questioning whether either could be trusted to deliver policy commitments. Sirota said a large freshman class could loosen Jeffries’s hold, while critics pointed to his opposition to Medicare for All and refusal to promise a vote.
  • The hosts said Republicans remain broadly pro-Trump and pro-Israel but that criticism of Trump, including over the Iran war, has become more public. They discussed Thomas Massie as a possible future challenger and said Trump’s weakening control could reopen the Republican populist movement’s internal fight.

Iran (1)

  • Chris Van Hollen and Ro Khanna proposed using the continuing resolution due December 11 to bar federal funding for the Iran war. A host cited the Vietnam-era funding restriction as precedent and argued that anti-war groups should demand an immediate end rather than defer action to later defense bills.

Health (1)

  • Bernie Sanders said Democrats should pass Medicare for All and dare Donald Trump to veto it, arguing Trump may be less ideological than his party. The hosts also urged Democrats to restore Medicaid cuts and Affordable Care Act subsidies, making Trump responsible if he blocks popular healthcare measures.

Corruption (1)

  • David Sirota argued that congressional investigations can expose lawbreaking, deter future abuses, and supply facts for legislation instead of leaving policy to corporate lobbyists. He backed broad scrutiny of Trump, corporate America, and the tech industry, rather than limiting investigations to Trump’s self-enrichment.

Banking (1)

  • Lina Khan argued that congressional oversight can drive economic reform; David Sirota said investigations should establish facts before lawmakers write bills. The hosts cited Ferdinand Pecora’s 1930s investigation of financiers as a model that helped lay groundwork for the Glass-Steagall Act and the Securities Exchange Act.

Models (1)

  • The hosts argued that current AI products have not improved everyday life as clearly as earlier consumer technologies, while data centers have made the costs visible to communities. One host also warned that Anthropic may be accelerating toward recursive self-improvement despite Dario Amodei’s public call to slow frontier development.

History (1)

  • The hosts compared Bernie Sanders’s influence on younger Democrats to Barry Goldwater’s effect on the Republican agenda, while noting that Sanders’s campaigns supplied a populist frame for later candidates. They linked millennial politics to the Iraq War, the financial crisis, Occupy, and disappointment with Barack Obama’s governing record.

Regulation (1)

  • The hosts opposed impeachment as a media spectacle unless investigations produce evidence strong enough to win Senate conviction; they suggested the Iran war’s legality or insider trading could supply a case. They also said Angie Nixon plans to run for Senate in 2028 after narrowly missing a statewide win.

11/4/26: Trump and MAGA Self Implode After Major Losses, Data Centers Crushed At Ballot Box • Nov 4

  • Data-center ballot measures lost 41 to 0, with opposition around 67% to 80% in every cited case. The hosts linked resistance to noise, pollution, energy bills, local control, and corruption, and said candidates opposing data centers also won races.
Also discussed on this episode: (15)

Elections (8)

  • Trump accepted the election results and said he wanted to work with Democrats, despite promoting a veto hat. The hosts noted there were election monitors but no ICE or National Guard deployment at polling places.
  • Trump called his first two years the greatest in presidential history, citing a closed southern border and zero crossings for 17 months. He blamed gasoline prices, not the Iran war, for voter discontent and called its costs short-term.
  • Mark Levin argued that the losses reflected weak candidates, confusing messaging, affordability, health care, housing, energy, and the Iran conflict, then blamed the “woke right.” The hosts said Levin was smearing a broad range of people who opposed the war.
  • Laura Loomer declared America effectively over, claiming Democrats would open the border, replace votes with those of undocumented immigrants, and impose communism and Sharia law. The hosts treated her post as an example of blaming critics for demoralizing the country.
  • Caroline Sunshine argued that Trump’s 2024 message had been co-opted by Democrats, who campaigned on corruption, the economy, and sending less money to foreign wars. The hosts said Republicans’ attacks on Hassan Piker distracted from voters’ concerns about prices and the war.
  • Republicans faced leadership contests after the losses: Steve Scalise was expected to challenge Jim Jordan, with Jordan’s small-dollar fundraising contrasted against Scalise’s lobbying ties. The hosts also reported that Mike Johnson would not run for minority leader.
  • The hosts said Democrats should consider replacing Chuck Schumer as Senate leader, arguing that new members could unite across ideological lines against him. They pointed to candidates who had opposed his leadership and said voters expected a break from the party’s past.
  • The hosts described anti-billionaire sentiment as a national political force and said tech wealth could not be rehabilitated with symbolic gestures. They cautioned that campaign money still matters, citing Will Lawrence’s costly race, but said spending has diminishing returns when voters reject a candidate’s message.

Media (1)

  • The hosts said Trump closely follows Fox News, complains about its polls and commentators, and would not commit to cabinet changes. They warned that blaming tariffs instead of the Iran war could keep Trump from hearing voters' opposition to the war.

Trade (1)

  • A Wall Street Journal editorial blamed Trump’s universal tariffs for hurting farm states and trade with Canada, while omitting Iran from its election analysis. The hosts said affordability and economic discontent helped drive the losses.

War (1)

  • The hosts briefly cited reports of children tortured in dungeons in Ukraine, attributed to the Azov Battalion, alongside riots. They said major international crises were unfolding while domestic election coverage absorbed attention.

Iran (2)

  • Democrats could use the approaching funding deadline to force a vote on the Iran war, Chris Van Hollen argued, including by withholding support for the National Defense Authorization Act if it enabled continued operations. The hosts said Chuck Schumer would face pressure to lead that fight.
  • Chris Murphy called the administration’s Iran war plan insane, warning it could prolong and escalate the conflict, target civilian infrastructure, and damage US security and the rule of law. The hosts criticized Democrats for discussing a continuing resolution that would fund the war.

AI Infrastructure (1)

  • The hosts outlined possible AI policy paths: guardrails, limits on recursive self-improvement, a full moratorium, or a broader pause. They said states could restrict data centers and AI even if Trump vetoed federal limits, while suggesting less model spending might make AI firms profitable sooner.

Models (1)

  • Abdul El-Sayed endorsed a full pause on frontier AI development, arguing that China’s work largely builds on US models and that both countries have an interest in avoiding uncontrolled recursive self-improvement. He also called for an international treaty and cooperation with China.

Did the Midterms Destroy All Hope for Data Centers? | E2360 • Nov 6

  • Democrats won both chambers in the midterms, while voters in more than a dozen Ohio towns and in Kansas, Florida, and California backed restrictions on new data centers. Texas Governor-elect Gina Inohosa campaigned for a construction pause pending new regulations.
Also discussed on this episode: (20)

AI Infrastructure (5)

  • Jason says Texas, Georgia, and Ohio together represent more than 40% of planned U.S. data center capacity. Bloomberg reported Microsoft was souring on neocloud providers, while Nscale lost a deal tied to a U.K. data center.
  • Jason gives Donald Trump high marks for backing AI infrastructure, energy expansion, and growth, but says Trump made data centers a partisan wedge issue. Jason argues split government provides useful checks and balances after Republicans lost both chambers.
  • Jason argues data centers can win local support by paying taxes, creating jobs, funding community benefits, and protecting water and electricity prices. He warns that slowing construction could trigger a recession lasting two to four years, and says operators must control noise, pollution, odors, and energy impacts.
  • Jason says the Republican split over AI centers on job losses, wealth concentration, and fears that technology firms will leave workers in a permanent underclass. He connects those concerns to opposition from Steve Bannon, Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and Megyn Kelly.
  • OpenAI pledged to cover the full cost of powering its data centers, solicit local input, publish construction plans, and avoid nondisclosure agreements with public officials. Jason says repeated, direct communication about utility bills, water use, taxes, and community impact is essential to building trust.

Markets (1)

  • Jason says markets corrected 5% to 6% after the election, but sees the selloff as overblown if tariffs ease and the Iran war ends. He calls the decline a buying opportunity in companies including Nvidia, Amazon, Uber, Tesla, and SpaceX.

Elections (1)

  • The hosts say affordability, government corruption, and opposition to war drove the Democratic wins more than culture-war messaging. Jason expects many new Democratic officeholders to govern from the center, while the co-host says party leaders largely waited for Trump’s policies to damage his standing.

Regulation (2)

  • Jason criticized Trump family meme coins soon after Trump took office, arguing that leaders responsible for fixing crypto regulation should not launch speculative tokens while doing so. He says government officials should keep personal trading at arm’s length from their public duties.
  • Jason says taxing loans backed by appreciated assets could address wealthy people borrowing against holdings instead of selling them. He described taxing margin loans above a threshold, while noting the gap between ordinary income and long-term capital-gains rates.

Trade (1)

  • Jason says Trump’s tariff goals were defensible but the rollout was chaotic, with public threats replacing a planned negotiating strategy. He argues leaders should hear directly from affected businesses; a clothing-company CEO described how tariffs were affecting his operations.

Models (2)

  • Anthropic signed its first content licensing deal with the Associated Press for election coverage, with Claude expected to provide attributed, up-to-date polling information. Jason distinguishes licensing from unsettled questions about training on purchased content and using copyrighted material in AI outputs.
  • Jason argues AI companies should share revenue with publishers and other rights holders rather than leave licensing disputes unresolved. He floated giving media businesses a portion of AI revenue, potentially through platform-wide arrangements that let publishers opt out.

Big Tech (3)

  • Apple reportedly cut daily AI budgets for engineers and may impose lower limits on other teams. Jason says high-value AI tools will likely move from flat-rate subscriptions toward usage-based corporate pricing, with companies reviewing who actually uses the tools.
  • Jason thinks Apple could let customers choose between cloud models and local models, using its own devices as an AI platform. The hosts also discussed an expensive touch-screen Mac configuration, with Jason questioning the value of touching a laptop display when an iPad can handle that use.
  • The hosts debated whether technology executives would return to progressive messaging after Democratic victories. Jason says Democrats should invite business leaders into policy discussions, while warning that executives who shifted toward Trump may face distrust if they reverse course.

Agents (1)

  • A host described using a Plaud pin and agent to route voice notes across Gmail, Calendar, Slack, Notion, Claude, and Grokbot, then build a product demo. Jason requested keyword-triggered actions and offline recording that syncs after a ski run, ideally through cellular connectivity.

Psychology (1)

  • Jason says only a small share of casino gamblers tip, and he prefers putting dealers into a hand so they can share the outcome. He described a home poker game that sometimes includes the server in a bomb pot, giving the worker a chance at a large payout.

Society (1)

  • The hosts traded Austin food opinions: one criticized Whataburger, while Jason said he would reconsider his view of P. Terry’s and praised Velvet Taco’s brisket and tikka masala tacos. The conversation framed these local chains as familiar parts of Austin life.

Media (2)

  • Jason recommended Godzilla Minus One, praising its emotional connection to the creature and its postwar Japanese setting. The hosts discussed the follow-up, Godzilla Minus Zero, which moves the story into the 1950s and was playing in theaters that week.
  • The co-host recommended the Korean monster film Hope, describing its long runtime, violent action, shifting story, and major twists. The same co-host praised season two of Apple TV+’s Dark Matter for treating travel between realities as a psychological problem rather than a superhero spectacle.
Hard Fork
Hard Fork

Casey Newton

Why the Tech Right Lost Big This Week • Nov 6

  • Ezra Klein cited polling showing broad concern about AI and data centers; 76% opposed a data center in their community. John Ossoff and other Democrats used concerns about AI risks to challenge the industry’s direction.
  • Data center opposition was strongest where construction is concentrated, including Texas, Ohio, Georgia, and Arizona. Erin Griffith said the issue could cross party lines and helped Democrats target Republican candidates in Ohio and Texas.
Also discussed on this episode: (15)

Elections (8)

  • Ezra Klein argues the tech right’s political power collapsed because it tied itself to Donald Trump and backed policies that left it exposed to backlash over AI, data centers, and billionaire influence.
  • Elon Musk’s election spending made him a target rather than a political asset, especially in Texas, where James Tallarico used Musk as a foil. Teddy Schleifer said Musk spent roughly $470 million to $500 million and did not secure a clear win in the races he backed.
  • Ezra Klein argued that Vivek Ramaswamy’s attack on Amy Acton’s family history was cruel and politically inept. He said tech-right candidates struggle when they imitate Trump’s style without Trump’s instincts or appeal to working-class voters.
  • Sergey Brin helped defeat California’s proposed wealth tax by funding opposition, while voters also rejected the measure amid doubts about its design and effects on the state. Ezra Klein expects wealth-tax proposals to return at the national level, where administration would be easier.
  • Reid Hoffman’s $17 million investment in James Tallarico’s Texas campaign paid off when Tallarico won by a wide margin. Teddy Schleifer also noted that the top 20 donors gave about $2 billion in the cycle, with more than $800 million linked to tech.
  • Crypto super PAC Fairshake spent $45 million opposing Sherrod Brown, who won his Ohio race. Teddy Schleifer said the result challenged the industry’s belief that opposing crypto would reliably cost a candidate an election.
  • The host observed that prediction markets were widely advertised during the elections but felt absorbed into routine election coverage rather than having a dramatic breakout. Ezra Klein pushed back, citing the Mississippi Senate market’s sharp movement after new information arrived.
  • Teddy Schleifer warned that campaign-finance totals reveal less than before because political money increasingly moves through opaque nonprofits. He said both wealthy conservatives and liberals have reasons to use dark money, including fear of political retaliation, making donor influence harder to track.

AI & Tech (3)

  • Ezra Klein says voters lack a persuasive case for AI: the industry warns it could take jobs or threaten humanity, while promising cheaper energy. He argues that public trust also depends on visible risk management and democratic oversight.
  • Greg Brockman and his wife withdrew a planned second $25 million contribution to the AI super PAC Leading the Future after his support became a distraction inside OpenAI. Teddy Schleifer said the pullback reflected worsening political conditions for AI spending.
  • Ezra Klein said Democrats need a positive case for technology, not only opposition to billionaire power, job losses, and environmental costs. He argued that AI’s promise of a future dominated by superintelligent systems does not give voters an appealing reason to support the industry.

AI Infrastructure (1)

  • Erin Griffith reported that 10 to 15 gigawatts of the roughly 45 gigawatts of energy expected to come online next year could be at risk in Texas. Ezra Klein countered that slower construction could limit wasteful investment and align capacity with useful AI adoption.

Big Tech (1)

  • Erin Griffith said some tech executives backed Trump to avoid regulation and embrace a more combative online culture. She argued that investors wrongly treat heavy product use, including ChatGPT’s global reach, as proof that people trust or support AI.

Education (1)

  • Erin Griffith reported that Google would restrict Search for schools that reject its AI products, prompting concern from educators and parents who want less technology in classrooms. The dispute raises questions about student privacy, surveillance, and whether schools can refuse bundled AI tools.

Regulation (1)

  • Ezra Klein said a bipartisan permitting reform bill could become a test of dealmaking and a venue for disputes over data center costs and energy construction. The proposal would ease building energy projects of different kinds and add provisions to make data centers bear more of their costs.

Why a Data Center Slowdown Benefits Big Tech • Nov 5

  • Citrini Research argues that data-center construction faces compounding power, grid-connection, labor, supply, and permitting constraints, alongside turbine delays and rising input costs. New state policies may add municipal concessions, clean-energy requirements, ratepayer protections, and slower approvals, raising project costs without stopping construction outright.
Also discussed on this episode: (18)

Big Tech (2)

  • OpenAI says ChatGPT now handles search requests at 20% of Google’s volume, although Adam Fry counts any query that triggers a web search. Sundar Pichai said AI Mode queries are slowing Google search revenue growth because they monetize less effectively.
  • Adam Fry said ChatGPT ads have not hurt product usage, and that users’ limited backlash may encourage OpenAI to expand advertising. Nathaniel Whittemore argues that search growth could strengthen OpenAI’s advertising business.

Models (1)

  • GPT 6.2 Astra and GPT 6.2 Sol appeared on Google Cloud’s backend, which Nathaniel Whittemore says usually signals an imminent release. The coming model comparison is whether GPT 6.2 can beat Opus 5.5.

Coding (2)

  • Meta acquired Conductor, a startup that coordinates multiple coding agents running in parallel, to help build future coding products. Conductor founder Charlie Holtz teased a different approach to coding interfaces, while Meta’s MuseCode has drawn little attention.
  • OpenAI agreed to acquire Pierre Computer Company, whose open-source tools help teams store codebases and track changes. Codex already uses Pierre’s tools, and the acquisition could support OpenAI’s ambition to add integrated services and compete with GitHub.

Agents (2)

  • Meta’s and OpenAI’s coding acquisitions point to competition shifting toward agent products and the overall developer experience, rather than model quality alone. Nathaniel Whittemore says leading labs appear to be preparing for a market where frontier models become less differentiated.
  • JPMorgan and Bank of America said they would block agents from accessing customer accounts, citing the risk of mistakes. Lead Bank and Increase Bank are testing agent-specific accounts, spending controls, emergency lockouts, and APIs through fintech partnerships.

Enterprise (2)

  • Apple cut engineering employees’ daily AI spending caps from $300 to $200, with another reduction to $100 under consideration; non-engineers already face a $100 cap that could fall to $25. Apple’s policy conflicts with its push to use AI internally and sell AI features as a reason to upgrade.
  • Apple’s previous $300 daily employee limit represented more than $6,000 a month, while Uber set a $1,500 monthly limit in June. Peter Steinberger argues that individual spending caps may stop making sense as workers use agents that run ongoing loops and maintain whole codebases.

Biology (1)

  • Google’s drug-discovery spinoff Isomorphic Labs is reportedly raising $5 billion at a $50 billion valuation to expand its operations. The company builds on DeepMind’s AlphaFold work, and Demis Hassabis shifted to chairman partly to focus on scaling it.

Elections (1)

  • Democrats’ election sweep put the Senate, House, and most state governments under Democratic control for two years, including Texas, where data-center construction has been central to the boom. Public resistance is strong: 43 of 44 data-center moratorium votes passed, and incoming Governor Gina Hinojosa is expected to be less supportive than Greg Abbott.

AI Infrastructure (4)

  • Nathaniel Whittemore argues that local leaders could allow data centers to proceed in exchange for transparency, full payment for infrastructure and power costs, environmental safeguards, and community benefits. Incoming Texas Senator James Tallarico has called for companies to pay for energy, recycle water, and obtain residents’ consent.
  • Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft all spent below their third-quarter capital-expenditure targets after construction delays. Microsoft attributed a $5 billion shortfall to a rented facility that was not ready, while Oracle warned it might invoke force majeure over a New Mexico project’s power-connection problems.
  • Nathaniel Whittemore and market analysts argue that a slower build-out could help hyperscalers lower capital spending, protect margins, and preserve free cash flow while easing pressure on power, labor, and supply chains. Matt Farley says constrained data-center capacity could raise compute rents and make infrastructure scarcity a competitive moat.
  • The Hill reported that hyperscalers are discussing a shared data-center framework with environmental groups, potentially giving Democrats enforceable community and environmental commitments while offering companies cover to moderate spending plans. Jessica Lesson says the market’s split reaction across hyperscalers, chips, and neoclouds suggests AI weakness need not pull the entire market down.

Markets (1)

  • Investors reacted differently across the AI trade: the S&P 500 and Nasdaq rose while chip and neocloud stocks fell, and the Magnificent Seven gained $1 trillion in market value. Seema Shah warned that volatility would continue amid possible Iran-war escalation, a December shutdown, and Federal Reserve rate hikes.

Regulation (2)

  • Progressives including Abdul Saeed and Yasemin Ansari have backed an AI pause, while Bernie Sanders has proposed jailing people who develop AGI. Nathaniel Whittemore considers a federal pause unlikely under a pro-AI president and a veto threat, and says Democrats remain divided between moderates and the Democratic Socialists of America.
  • Nathaniel Whittemore expects more room for agreement on AI policy than the pause-versus-acceleration debate suggests, including possible liability for labs, safety-incident disclosures, and third-party audits. He argues that wider public debate is appropriate as model capabilities keep advancing.

How the Midterm Results Change AI • Nov 4

  • A Pew poll found AI ranked below the economy, democracy, and several other issues in voter importance. Opposition to local data centers was much broader than concern about AI as an abstract issue.
  • Pew found opposition to pro-data-center candidates across party lines, with stronger resistance among Democrats. Nathaniel Whittemore says the campaign issue was chiefly the local costs and control associated with data centers.
  • NBC exit polling found data centers mattered to voters, but ranked below immigration, Iran, cost of living, and corruption. Democrats were twice as likely as Republicans to cite data centers as a major voting factor.
  • Sherrod Brown and Abdul El-Sayed linked data centers to household costs, concentrated tech wealth, surveillance, and political power. Trump’s public defense of data centers left Republicans in tight races little room to break with him.
  • Ohio’s data-center plans gave Sherrod Brown a concrete campaign target: he attacked Jon Husted’s support for development and won back his Senate seat. Brown returned with 18 years of Senate experience and a sharper grievance against the tech industry after its spending against him.
  • Texas’s governor’s race created a major uncertainty for data-center developers: Gina Hinojosa defeated Greg Abbott after Abbott paused new permits pending an energy and environmental review. Hinojosa campaigned on a moratorium, ending tax subsidies, and protecting local electricity and water access.
  • Jon Ossoff made data centers a symbol of tech oligarchy, corruption, and rising household costs, and won a second Senate term. Whittemore says Ossoff had done little beyond headline-friendly investigations, but his campaign could push him toward a larger AI policy role.
Also discussed on this episode: (8)

Elections (3)

  • Nathaniel Whittemore says Democrats won control of both chambers after an 11-point national swing, flipping seats in Republican strongholds; they are unlikely to have a veto-proof supermajority.
  • Scott Wiener’s California House race put AI regulation in the spotlight; Wiener had sponsored SB 1047, whose provisions included developer liability and a mandatory kill switch. The bill influenced later California laws that became models for other states.
  • Abdul El-Sayed campaigned against AI through concerns about job loss, economic disruption, surveillance, AI-powered warfare, and loss of control. He also raised the possibility that AI could be used to create a biological weapon.

Regulation (2)

  • Nathaniel Whittemore expects Congress to avoid a sweeping federal AI framework or nationwide data-center moratorium, especially with Trump promising to veto Democratic legislation. He expects hearings and state-level restrictions to matter more immediately.
  • Whittemore sees bipartisan openings for whistleblower protections, required incident reporting, stronger model-builder liability, and legal requirements for frontier-model testing. He also expects debate over data sovereignty, export controls, pausing development, and limits on recursive self-improvement.

Models (1)

  • Whittemore argues that pressure for AI rules will rise as models gain capabilities, including capabilities for harmful uses. He sees broadly accepted baseline protections as a foundation for later, more contested rules.

AI Infrastructure (2)

  • Data-center developers now have to earn local consent by limiting nondisclosure agreements, covering their own infrastructure and electricity costs, and offering community benefits. Whittemore expects some new leaders to pair enforceable local protections with a workable path for projects.
  • Whittemore’s downside scenario is that expanding moratoriums and state actions cut off Wall Street funding, stall AI construction, bankrupt neoclouds, and trigger a wider downturn. A burst AI investment bubble could then shape the 2028 campaign alongside jobs, cybersecurity, and existential-risk concerns.

Tucker Responds to the Republican Midterm Bloodbath • Nov 5

  • Carlson argues data centers became a winning Democratic issue because voters saw them as ugly, resource-intensive projects that could serve surveillance more than local communities; he says Greg Abbott backed them while his opponent campaigned against them.
Also discussed on this episode: (14)

Elections (7)

  • Tucker Carlson calls the Republican losses a broad rejection of the Trump administration: he cites Ohio, a Democratic sweep of Texas statewide offices, a possible Democratic Senate win in Mississippi, and an Alabama state-house seat won by a transgender Democrat.
  • Carlson says voters punished Republican leaders for treating their own supporters with contempt, citing Lindsey Graham’s sister’s Senate bid, Mike Rogers’s return after a previous loss, and Texas incumbents seeking fourth terms.
  • Carlson says the losses leave Republicans facing a generational Senate disadvantage: even a sweeping 2028 presidential win might not restore Senate control, and Congress cannot check Trump’s war powers until the new session begins.
  • Rich Baris says voters’ leading reasons for rejecting Republicans were ending the war, lowering living costs, putting America first, and changing the relationship with Israel. Baris says Republicans broke promises to avoid new Middle East wars and protect ordinary voters.
  • Carlson describes Trump’s 2024 coalition as a nationalist alliance that crossed racial and partisan lines, while Baris says it could have sustained Republican power for decades. Both argue that prioritizing foreign policy and identity fights fractured that coalition.
  • Baris says Republican gains among Jewish voters were small and that most Jewish voters opposed the Iran war; he reports Abdul El-Sayed won Michigan’s Jewish vote despite Republican attacks framing him as a threat. Baris calls the gains too small to justify alienating younger and other voters.
  • Baris blames Republican strategists and donors for breaking a coalition by sidelining dissenters and exploiting Charlie Kirk’s death to restore older political voices. He says attacks on Thomas Massie split votes, while costly Texas spending failed to overcome voters’ anger and demographic change.

Media (2)

  • Carlson accuses Fox News of helping sell the Iran war directly to Trump through programming he watched, and says nearly the entire lineup supported it. He also says Fox’s survey showed Iran mattered to only a small share of voters.
  • Carlson says political and media narratives rewrite events as they unfold, making later policy decisions less informed. He compares honest historical accounting to aviation crash investigations and argues that obscuring the reasons for past Middle East wars enabled repeated interventions.

War (1)

  • Carlson warns that Russia and Iran may exploit Trump’s domestic weakness while he retains executive authority, citing threats against the United States and its allies, including Ukraine, Europe, and the Gulf states.

Society (1)

  • Carlson argues that government should apply equal standards to individuals regardless of race or religion, and says both anti-Semitism and anti-white or anti-Muslim discrimination deserve opposition. He claims discrimination against white people remains embedded in university, hiring, and contracting policy.

Corruption (1)

  • Carlson calls the Epstein files a test of equal accountability, arguing that officials from either party must support their release. He questions Jared Kushner’s Middle East and Ukraine work alongside private fundraising, and says powerful figures may escape scrutiny while junior staff take the blame.

Psychology (2)

  • Carlson argues that Republican candidates weakened their appeal to men by projecting vanity, indecision, and performative toughness instead of restraint and decisiveness. He contrasts the party’s campaign imagery with candidates he portrays as more grounded and masculine.
  • Carlson says political drama and social-media framing can make people judge their lives by national events instead of relationships and daily circumstances. He argues that a slower political pace would give people room to think after years of crisis-driven attention.