03-11-2026Price:

The Frontier

Your signal. Your price.

BUSINESS

Iran's Oil Weapon Targets Dollar

Wednesday, March 11, 2026 · from 9 podcasts, 14 episodes
What Bitcoin DidBreaking Points with Krys…Breaking Points with Krys…The Jack Mallers ShowBreaking Points with Krys…Breaking Points with Krys…Peter St Onge PodcastForward GuidanceBreaking Points with Krys…The Tucker Carlson ShowBreaking Points with Krys…PBD PodcastProf G MarketsThe Prof G Pod with Scott…
  • Iran's retaliatory strategy is targeting oil prices to trigger inflation, betting the U.S., burdened by $40 trillion in debt, cannot withstand another inflationary spike.
  • The Strait of Hormuz disruption is the largest oil supply shock since the 1970s, demanding price levels that will crush global demand, especially in Asia and Europe.
  • The conflict exposes a deeper proxy war over global order and dollar dominance, with China's discounted energy supply chain now under direct attack.

Iran is fighting back with inflation. On multiple shows, analysts argued the regime's primary weapon is not missiles or drones, but the price of oil. Jack Mallers stated Iran is choosing inflation over nuclear weapons, exploiting America's fiscal and political vulnerabilities. Luke Gromen concurred, framing the conflict as a trigger for an imminent financial crisis driven by reckless monetary policies.

The scale of the shock is historic. Rory Johnston described it as the largest disruption of energy systems since the 1970s, with the loss of 20 million barrels per day equivalent to peak COVID lockdown demand destruction. Prices must rise to levels that will force global demand destruction, hitting Asia and Europe hardest. Mark Zandi noted this creates a stagflationary trap where stocks and bonds could fall together, destroying portfolio diversification.

The economic war is also a proxy contest over the global order and the dollar. Tucker Carlson framed it as a fight over whether the U.S. or China sets global rules. Peter St Onge explained the U.S. strike removed a key source of discounted oil for China, forcing Beijing to bid for more expensive Russian supply and aligning with 'petrodollar defense' theories. Jeff Snider argued Iran's only remaining leverage is the oil price and its hold over China, which buys 90% of its sanctioned crude.

Internally, the U.S. administration is panicking over oil price volatility, according to Krystal Ball, while publicly urging sacrifice for a war the public does not want. Saagar Enjeti highlighted the escalatory cycle, where comments about changing Iran's map make the conflict existential for its population, trapping the U.S. in a longer fight. The bond market's failure to act as a wartime safe haven, with yields rising instead of falling, signals a lack of confidence in U.S. credit.

The rules of wartime finance are breaking down.

Rory Johnston, Breaking Points:

- I think the main thing the oil market is attempting to handicap is the duration of this disruption through the Strait of Hormuz and the broader attacks against infrastructure in the region.

- This is the largest scale disruption of energy systems at least since the 1970s, and potentially, if this goes on much longer, potentially the longest in history.

EnergyMarketsMacroWarChina

Source Intelligence

What each podcast actually said

What Bitcoin Did
What Bitcoin Did

Iran, Oil and the Next Financial Crisis | Luke Gromen • Mar 10

  • Luke Gromen says the U.S. Navy's recent refusal to enter the Strait of Hormuz after Iranian aggression revealed the failure of America's global military protection racket.
  • Gromen argues this collapse of the security guarantee is catastrophic for U.S. financial dominance, as the dollar's status relies on global trust in American protection.
  • Iran demonstrated in the conflict that modern missile and drone technology has rendered traditional, legacy naval power partially obsolete.
  • The immediate financial pressure point is oil, with Gromen stating U.S. bond and stock markets cannot withstand a sustained price of $100 per barrel.
  • Gromen claims Iran is now weaponizing oil price spikes against U.S. fiscal stability, using this knowledge to force tactical pauses in conflict.
  • Bitcoin's price rose during recent Middle East tensions, a departure from its typical correlation with risk on assets, which Gromen interprets as a sign it is functioning as a geopolitical hedge.
  • Gromen predicts the conflict will accelerate a frantic push by Iran, China, and Russia for Iran to obtain nuclear weapons.
  • Gromen concludes that the U.S. attempt to use Iran to choke China's oil supply has backfired, instead uniting adversaries against a common financial pressure point.

Also from this episode:

BTC Markets (1)
  • This price action suggests a growing market perception of Bitcoin as digital property, separate from the fragilities of the traditional financial system.
WarTradeMarketsBTC Markets
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar

3/10/26: Trump Threatens 'Fury' On Iran, Israel Panics, Iran Rejects Ceasefire • Mar 10

  • Donald Trump sent conflicting public signals about the Iran war to manipulate financial markets, according to Breaking Points.
  • Trump told a reporter the war was 'very complete' near market close, boosting the S&P 500 and lowering oil prices.
  • Later, Trump threatened Iran with 'fire and fury' and said it would be hit '20 times harder', causing market volatility.
  • Trump's aggressive public threats starkly contrasted with his advisors' private desire for an exit strategy, revealing internal panic.
  • Behind the scenes, Trump advisors reportedly leaked concerns about political backlash and depleting support for a prolonged war.
  • The advisors encouraged Trump to articulate an exit strategy, highlighting the administration's struggle to control the conflict narrative.
  • Saagar Enjeti argued that once in an escalatory cycle, it's not easy to simply declare victory and walk away.
  • The conflict escalated with a strike on an oil refinery in the UAE and multiple other targets across the region.
  • High oil prices prompted G7 nations to consider releasing strategic petroleum reserves to mitigate economic damage.
  • Iran rejected calls for a ceasefire, with officials telling Trump to 'be careful not to get eliminated yourself'.
  • This hostile rhetoric from Iran, following the assassination of a previous leader, suggests the country is far from backing down.
  • The analysis concludes the US is trapped in a dangerous escalatory cycle with Iran, making a clean off-ramp difficult.
WarMiddle EastTrade

3/10/26: US Scrambles On Depleting Munitions, Trump Begs Ships To Cross Strait Of Hormuz, Epstein Prison Guard Cash Deposit • Mar 10

  • The oil market is experiencing dramatic price swings above and below $100 a barrel.
  • Krystal Ball stated the administration is panicking over the price of oil.
  • Iranian missile capabilities pose a real risk to ships in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • U.S. gas prices surged from around $2.92 a month ago to approximately $3.54 today.
  • The administration's emergency measures to release oil reserves are a temporary solution at best.
  • Analysts predict the oil price surge could lead to energy shortages and significant demand destruction in many developing nations.
  • Countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan are already facing power outages as energy supplies dwindle.
  • Gas constraints in places like Bangalore could prevent hotels like Marriott and Hilton from serving breakfast.
  • Krystal Ball called it disgusting and preposterous to urge sacrifices for a war that people do not want.
  • The interdependence of global economies means a contraction in Gulf states could send ripples through the U.S. market.
  • If major investors from Gulf regions pull back, the U.S. could face a wave of sector disruptions.
  • Shaky job numbers in sectors reliant on affordable energy suggest a looming economic crisis.

Also from this episode:

Trade (3)
  • Trump urged ships to traverse the Strait of Hormuz unapologetically, which is seen as dismissing real risks.
  • The insurance industry is hesitant to cover voyages through the Strait of Hormuz amid rising geopolitical tensions.
  • The Iranian state sees economic pressure as a strategic weapon to destabilize American markets.
Diplomacy (1)
  • Analysts note that the Iranian regime may not be inclined to allow a U.S. resurgence, opting for long-term economic warfare.
MarketsEnergyWarMacro

3/9/26: Oil Apocalypse, New Ayatollah Chosen, Jeff Sachs Dire Warning, Lindsey Graham Coached Bibi On Convincing Trump • Mar 9

  • The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused a supply shock of 20 million barrels per day, matching the demand destruction seen at the peak of COVID lockdowns in March and April 2020.
  • Oil analyst Rory Johnston argues that oil prices must rise to over $200 per barrel to force global demand destruction sufficient to balance the supply loss.
  • Johnston says the oil market's primary concern is determining the duration of the Strait of Hormuz closure, which will dictate the scale and persistence of the crisis.
  • According to Johnston, Donald Trump framing the crisis as a short-term 'Iran nuclear threat' in a social post sends a dangerous signal, suggesting leadership believes the conflict can be managed long-term, potentially extending the closure.
  • The crisis will hit refined products first, with diesel and jet fuel facing immediate shortages. Asian jet fuel prices have already spiked to levels equivalent to over $200 per barrel.
  • Refineries in Asia, fearful of feedstock loss, have preemptively cut operations from 90% to 65% of capacity, instantly reducing supplies of diesel and jet fuel globally.
  • Johnston projects gasoline prices in the U.S. will breach $4 per gallon and head toward $6, while developing nations will face outright shortages and gas lines due to unaffordable imports.
  • The physical disruption means the full crude supply loss won't hit global refining for another month or two as pre-loaded tankers sail, but downstream market panic and the required demand destruction are already underway.
MarketsEnergyFedMacro

3/9/26: Trump Doesn't Rule Out War Draft, Fox Coverup On Trump Fallen Soldier Disgrace, Desalination Plants Struck • Mar 9

  • President Trump refused to rule out deploying US ground troops to Iran, stating any deployment would need a very good reason.
  • Trump said the goal of a deployment would be to decimate Iranian forces to the point where maybe nobody is left to surrender.
  • Trump suggested the map of Iran would probably not look the same after the conflict.
  • Breaking Points host Saagar Enjeti argued this imperial framing transforms the war from an attack on a regime into an attack on the Iranian nation-state itself.
  • Enjeti said this framing gives Iranian propaganda a powerful rallying cry and ensures the population will fight to the death.
  • Host Krystal Ball noted another American service member was confirmed killed.
  • Ball stated it is now incontrovertible that a US Tomahawk missile struck a girls' school in a double-tap strike, killing 168 children.
  • Apocalyptic scenes of burning oil supplies in Tehran are creating a literal movie of a hellscape for civilians, according to Krystal Ball.
  • Regional actors like the Iraqi Kurds want no part of the conflict, remembering they were abandoned before.
  • The Iraqi Kurds are now within range of Iranian missiles, making their refusal to join any incursion a practical decision.
  • Saagar Enjeti summarized Trump's comments as completely all over the map, with the most noteworthy being not ruling out boots on the ground.
  • Enjeti concluded that at every turn, all Trump does is make the war even more existential for the people of Iran.
  • The stated US goal appears to be regime collapse and chaos in Iran.
  • Every escalatory comment and confirmed civilian strike makes regime collapse less likely and a wider, more devastating war more certain.
WarMiddle East

3/5/26: Trump Preps Forever War, Hegseth Rages At Media, CIA Kurdish Psyop, Congress Backs Iran War • Mar 5

  • The U.S. drumbeat for military engagement with Iran is growing louder.
  • U.S. officials are discussing the implications of a potential ground invasion of Iran.
  • Krystal Ball stated this conflict with Iran is a full-fledged, open-ended conflict and will continue forward.
  • Key U.S. political figures have begun referring to the conflict in distinctly religious terms.
  • Secretary Hegseth insisted the U.S. military will maintain complete, uncontested control of Iranian airspace.
  • Hegseth's comments position the conflict as one that could extend indefinitely, reminiscent of Donald Rumsfeld's 2003 Iraq predictions.
  • Concerns are mounting around potential oil shortages which could further destabilize the region.
  • Oil storage in Gulf countries is nearing depletion, which could complicate military tactics and international relations.
  • U.S. officials have issued dire warnings about munitions shortages, indicating a high level of urgency.
  • Reports of military movements, including strikes on U.S. assets and oil infrastructure, are adding to the complications.
  • The escalation of rhetoric and military posturing shows a willingness to consider options previously labeled unacceptable.
  • The central question raised is whether this conflict is another forever war in the making.

Also from this episode:

Media (2)
  • Opaque government communications and media censorship during the conflict make it harder to gauge the real situation on the ground.
  • There is a systematic effort to control the flow of information, emphasizing the need to scrutinize media bias.

3/4/26: Trump Panics After Israel Blamed For Iran War, US Pushes Iran Civil War, Spain Rebukes Trump, Gas Prices Soar • Mar 4

  • Trump claimed his administration's preemptive actions forced Israel's hand in the Iran conflict, not the other way around.
  • According to Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti, Trump mischaracterized negotiations and cast Iran as the primary instigator of the conflict.
  • Democrats emerged from classified briefings alarmed by the Trump administration's lack of a coherent strategy in handling the crisis with Iran.
  • Lawmakers expressed deep concern about the administration's inconsistent messaging and the U.S. path forward, fearing they were fumbling at a critical time.
  • Trump downplayed potential fallout from the conflict, suggesting the worst-case scenario was merely a regime change leading to another unstable government.
  • Hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti pointed out that Trump's narrative ignored the complexities and nuances of the geopolitical situation with Iran.
  • The suggestion that Iran was formulating an attack raised questions about the credibility of intelligence and the motives behind U.S. military actions.
  • Reports of attacks on U.S. military installations in the region had raised alarms, contributing to a broader sense of disarray.
  • Analysts argued that without a cohesive U.S. approach, outcomes for both the U.S. and Iran could worsen, creating regional instability.
  • Trump was quoted as saying, "We have them very much beaten militarily from the military standpoint," regarding the conflict.
The Jack Mallers Show
The Jack Mallers Show

Oil, Bonds, and Bitcoin: The Rules Are That There Are No Rules • Mar 10

  • Iran is retaliating against US pressure by manipulating oil prices to trigger inflation, according to host Jack Mallers.
  • Mallers argues Iran believes the fiscally strained US, with its $40 trillion debt, cannot withstand another inflationary spike.
  • Iran's counterattack is economic, not nuclear, exploiting US debt burden and political intolerance for inflation.
  • Mallers states Iran is weaponizing energy prices by threatening to disrupt oil flows.
  • Iran is betting it can outlast the US in a protracted price war because Washington cannot afford it.
  • The bond market is failing as a traditional wartime safe haven, with yields rising instead of falling during current turmoil.
  • Mallers notes this yield inversion suggests foreign creditors are losing confidence in US credit.
  • The system depends on exporting dollars to finance imports, a circular game that cracks when trust evaporates.
  • Sunday night saw a massive spike in oil futures followed by a complete reversal, which Mallers interprets as evidence of fragility.
  • The S&P 500's first 5% correction since November adds to the picture of a perfect storm of war and financial stress.
  • Mallers sees war destabilizing the geopolitical order while financial stress exposes what he calls the monetary ponzi scheme.
  • Traditional wartime finance is breaking down, leaving the dollar system exposed to a new form of asymmetric warfare.
  • Host Jack Mallers stated, 'I think that Iran is choosing inflation over nuclear weapons.'
  • Mallers also said, 'Iran's fight back is through the oil price.'
MacroMarketsEnergy
Peter St Onge Podcast
Peter St Onge Podcast

Ep 163 Weekly Roundup: Iran, China, and the Petrodollar • Mar 9

  • Peter St Onge argues the U.S. strike on Iran's leadership was designed to cut off China's primary source of cheap, sanctioned oil, which was receiving 90% of Iran's exports.
  • Before the strike, Peter St Onge notes that 25% of China's oil imports came from Russia, Venezuela, and Iran, a share that had risen to 40% post-war, with half of that from Venezuela and Iran.
  • With Iran and Venezuela sanctioned off the dollar-based SWIFT system, Peter St Onge says China was buying their oil at a steep discount, building a crucial cheap energy buffer now lost.
  • Peter St Onge claims China must now compete globally for more expensive oil, outbidding others for the remaining half of Russian exports not already flowing its way, creating a severe cost shock.
  • Peter St Onge connects the moves against Iran and Venezuela to petrodollar defense, arguing that neutralizing the two largest non-dollar oil exporters reinforces the dollar's role as the global reserve currency.
  • Peter St Onge suggests U.S. policy may have pivoted from favoring a weak dollar for exports to needing a strong dollar to finance its own trillion-dollar deficits.
  • Peter St Onge calls the Trump EPA's repeal of the Obama-era CO2 endangerment finding the largest deregulation in history, estimating $1.3 trillion in direct savings.
  • Peter St Onge argues the EPA deregulation lowers energy costs, revives auto manufacturing, guts climate litigation, and could provide nearly $300 billion in annual growth benefits, aiding a domestic industrial renaissance.
  • Peter St Onge frames both the foreign energy shock and domestic deregulation as a concerted effort to reassert American economic primacy by strangling a rival's advantages and unshackling domestic industry.
WarTradeChinaEnergyRegulation
Forward Guidance
Forward Guidance

Is The Iran Energy Shock About To Break Markets? | Weekly Roundup • Mar 6

  • The Iran-Israel conflict is creating significant volatility in oil markets.
  • Market reactions reveal a lack of consensus on the severity and duration of the supply disruption.
  • Oil prices are experiencing acute stress and volatility not seen since the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Extreme volatility is concentrated in front-month oil contracts, where speculation has ramped up.
  • Despite the headlines, oil is hovering just above $80, a price level lower than some might expect.
  • Speculative pressures from traders are heavily influencing current market performance.
  • Speculators are overwhelmingly focused on short-term, front-month contracts due to rapid geopolitical shifts.
  • Producers are hedging against future price uncertainties, adding complexity to the oil pricing curves.
  • A significant market divide exists between retail investors and institutional 'smart money'.
  • Retail investors remain optimistically bullish and are buying the dip even as charts decline.
  • Institutional money is reevaluating positions, pulling back from high-flying stocks and accepting mounting risks.
  • The speaker notes that all supply shocks start similarly, and the key question is the duration of the disruption.
  • According to the speaker, the market has not yet fully accepted how long the Iran-Israel crisis will last.
  • The core question for energy markets is how long the disruptions will last and what their ultimate shape will be.

Also from this episode:

Diplomacy (1)
  • This crisis represents a potential climax of decades of geopolitical decisions, according to the analysis.
The Tucker Carlson Show
The Tucker Carlson Show

War Update: Israel’s True Motives, Potential False Flags, and Oncoming Global Crisis • Mar 5

  • Tucker Carlson argues that the conflict with Iran is a proxy contest over which country, the U.S. or China, sets the rules for the global order.
  • Carlson states that the U.S. has refused to accept it is no longer the world's sole superpower, a status it has held since 1991.
  • He claims that China, whose rise was accelerated by joining the WTO in 2001, is now a peer competitor with a larger real economy and comparable technological output.
  • Carlson argues that the rational move for the U.S. would be to negotiate a power-sharing arrangement with China, but Washington cannot acknowledge this need.
  • Carlson claims that while Washington holds talks about defending Taiwan, it lacks the actual military capacity to do so, and the world is watching.
  • He explains that Iran is part of this conflict because great-power rivalries, like those between the U.S., China, and Russia, are fought through proxy states.
  • Carlson states that while Russia and China are not fighting alongside Iran militarily, they are on Iran's side, and the outcome matters greatly to them, making resolution harder.
  • He identifies a second, religious dimension to the war that he believes most Americans miss.
  • Carlson cites Senator Lindsey Graham saying 'this is a religious war' and argues Graham was telling the truth.
  • He claims the real religious stakes center on control of Jerusalem's foundation stone, a site sacred to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
  • Carlson argues that this Jewish desire collides directly with Islam's own sacred claims on the same ground in Jerusalem.
  • He believes the fusion of geopolitical and theological motives is what makes the current conflict so resistant to easy or quick resolution.
  • Carlson warns that it is better to negotiate from a position of strength than from a position of weakness.

Also from this episode:

Diplomacy (2)
  • He uses an analogy, comparing the U.S. to a parent who can no longer simply bark orders at a child who has grown taller.
  • He concludes that U.S. leaders lacked the wisdom and foresight to negotiate from strength, risking a weaker post-conflict position.
Religion (4)
  • Carlson explains that the foundation stone is where Jews believe the world began, Muslims believe Muhammad ascended to heaven, and Christians locate the site of the crucifixion.
  • He traces the history of Solomon's Temple being built on that stone, destroyed by Babylonians, rebuilt, and then razed by Rome in 70 AD.
  • Carlson notes that the destruction of the Second Temple fulfilled a prophecy by Jesus that not one stone would be left on another.
  • He states that traditional Torah Judaism cannot function without the temple, creating a 2,000-year-old desire to rebuild it.
War
PBD Podcast
PBD Podcast

Iran's Strait of Hormuz THREATS + McDonald’s CEO Gets ROASTED | PBD #752 • Mar 4

  • Iran's primary leverage isn't drones or missiles, but its ability to threaten the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of global oil flows.
  • Analyst Jeff Snider stated that Iran's only remaining pressure point is oil and the leverage it has over China.
  • Iran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz is specifically aimed at pressuring China, which buys 80-90% of Iranian crude oil.
  • A Hormuz closure would hit China harder than almost any other nation due to its heavy reliance on Iranian oil.
  • The Trump administration's strategy appears to be neutralizing Iran's navy before it can make a credible threat to close the Strait.
  • A reported U.S. submarine strike sank an Iranian warship off Sri Lanka, thousands of miles from the Persian Gulf.
  • The sunk Iranian warship was positioned on the sea lane connecting the Middle East to China, intended to escort oil tankers toward Chinese ports.
  • West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices barely moved on the news of the Hormuz threat, indicating a muted market reaction.
  • Co-host Mark Moss attributed the calm oil market to a structural shift: U.S. energy independence has defanged what would once have been a global oil shock.
  • Moss noted that 60% of European natural gas now comes from the United States, a major shift in energy geopolitics.
  • American energy exports now act as a form of geopolitical leverage, described by Moss as a kind of 'sixth fleet'.
  • The U.S. is no longer just a consumer in the global oil equation, which changes the geopolitical calculus around supply chokepoints.
ChinaMiddle East
Prof G Markets
Prof G Markets

Why The Iran War Could Reignite Inflation • Mar 4

  • Investors initially priced a quick regime change in Iran, similar to Venezuela, but Iranian resistance has proven more resilient than expected.
  • The tougher-than-expected Iranian resistance has forced a market repricing of oil and equity risk.
  • Brent crude oil prices broke through $85 a barrel for the first time since 2024 due to the conflict.
  • Robert Armstrong of the Financial Times describes the current conflict scenario as a 'slightly worse best case scenario.'
  • Investors still hope for a resolution within weeks, not months, but the distribution of possible outcomes has widened.
  • The 10-year Treasury yield spiked as traders priced in inflation risk from the conflict.
  • European equities, which are more gas-dependent than US equities, fell by 3%.
  • The energy shock from the conflict hits regions asymmetrically; US consumers face higher gas prices, while Europe and Asia face full-blown inflation crises.
  • The United States is insulated from oil supply shocks because it produces as much oil as it consumes.
  • Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics notes that every sustained $10 increase in crude oil translates to roughly a 25-cent-per-gallon increase at American gas stations.
  • Zandi states that while higher gas prices are real money for lower-income US households, the shock is survivable domestically.
  • Europe and Asia face existential energy math because they consume energy they do not produce, leaving them with no hedge against supply shocks.
  • Matthew Martin of Semafor reports that attacks on Qatari gas facilities have sent European natural gas prices up 40%.
  • US natural gas prices, measured by Henry Hub, rose only 6% compared to Europe's 40% spike.
  • Germany's industrial base is highly dependent on natural gas, making it particularly vulnerable to price spikes.
  • South Korea's KOSPI index plunged 7% on fears of energy supply disruptions.
  • Mark Zandi warns that persistent oil price inflation could force stocks and bonds to move in positive correlation, both falling as yields rise on inflation fears.
  • This positive correlation between stocks and bonds would destroy the diversification that normally cushions investment portfolios.
  • Zandi describes a scenario where bonds cannot rise when stocks fall due to inflationary oil price shocks as a 'stagflationary trap.'
  • Zandi cites a potential prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz as an example of an event that could trigger such an inflationary oil shock.
The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

Raging Moderates: War in Iran Backfires as MAGA Turns on Trump • Mar 4

  • Vance claimed the goal of the strikes was to eliminate Iran's nuclear capacity permanently, not just for Trump's term.
  • Marco Rubio admitted the timeline for US strikes on Iran was dictated by Israel's planned attack and anticipated Iranian retaliation.
  • Scott Galloway characterized Rubio's admission as "The tail wagging $1.1 trillion in military spending."
  • The Trump administration's messaging has been defensive improvisation, with the president reportedly workshopping talking points in real time.
  • Six US service members died in a makeshift Kuwait facility that lacked basic drone defenses they had been requesting for months.

Also from this episode:

Elections (2)
  • JD Vance sold Donald Trump for years as a "no new wars" president, a break from Bush-era hawks.
  • The America First wing, including figures like Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and Megyn Kelly, is now accusing Trump of betrayal as US strikes hit Iran and casualties climb.
Diplomacy (5)
  • Rubio's statement confirmed isolationist fears that Benjamin Netanyahu, not the US President, is dictating American foreign policy.
  • UK Labour leader Keir Starmer called the US-led war in Iran illegal.
  • Spain has expelled US forces from its territory in response to the conflict.
  • France is building nuclear arsenals without consulting Washington, signaling a break from US-led alliances.
  • Commentator Jessica Harlo noted that Rubio essentially said Israel is now dictating foreign policy for America.
Middle East

Related Stories